Opinion: Senate shouldn’t sunset valuable education program


It’s that time of year, when we see what new excuse legislators will conjure to stymie one of the state’s most popular educational programs.

Georgia’s tax-credit scholarship program helps more than 13,000 students each year attend the private school of their choice. Donors to scholarship organizations get a dollar-for-dollar state tax credit, and the credits, limited to $58 million annually, are oversubscribed every year on the first day they’re made available.

And the state almost certainly saves money. A new study by the education reform group EdChoice shows the program breaks even if at least 68 percent of students would otherwise be in public schools, costing thousands of dollars more per year to educate than under the tax-credit scholarship program. Given that three-quarters of scholarship families earn less than $66,000 per year, it’s a safe bet the state is hitting at least that 68 percent rate. EdChoice estimates the program saves state and local school systems about $25 million per year.

Yet, time and time again, legislators have seemingly created new ways to avoid increasing the $58 million cap on the credits that can be awarded — and thus a cap on the number of students who can attend a school that’s better for them, and a cap on the savings to state and local taxpayers.

In recent years, the problem has tended to arise from the state Senate. This year is no exception.

Last year, after the House passed a bill to gradually raise the cap to $85 million, the Senate inserted a poison pill to limit the amount scholarship organizations, known as SSOs, can keep to cover their administrative costs. That issue has been resolved: The limits would be tighter than today, but structured in a way that wouldn’t cripple smaller SSOs.

Now the problem is the Senate’s new policy of automatically sunsetting tax credits. It’s a partially sound idea whose flaws show up when it’s applied universally.

There are a couple of kinds of tax credits. Probably the most common kind attempts to stimulate some kind of new activity, usually economic in nature. The idea is to offer an incentive to a company or industry to relocate or expand its operations here. In many cases, pre-determining when that kind of credit will end makes sense.

But the other kind — and this is where the tax-credit scholarship falls — is the kind that encourages private actors to do what the state either can’t do, or can’t do as efficiently. This is a program gives families more educational options and saves state and local governments money, without creating any concrete harms to anyone else (believe me, if the local school systems that hate this program could prove they’d been harmed, they would’ve offered the evidence by now).

Why should that kind of program be subjected to an automatic sunset, and all the uncertainty that creates for families? As Lt. Gov. Casey Cagle told me, to explain why he cautions against putting a sunset on the program, “these scholarships more times than not follow students for most, if not all, of their k-12 education.” Blindly ending the program will truly harm those students.

The idea seems to be that if something is worth doing, it must be worth stopping — without regard to how much good it’s doing.

Requiring more data reporting (as this bill does) and a periodic review of the program that stops short of automatically ending it would increase accountability without adding needless uncertainty. If that’s what senators really want, that’s what they should do.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Three big lessons we didn’t learn from economic crisis

Ten years ago, after making piles of money gambling with other people’s money, Wall Street nearly imploded, and the outgoing George W. Bush and incoming Obama administrations bailed out the bankers. America should have learned three big lessons from the crisis. We didn’t, to our continuing peril. First unlearned lesson: Banking is a risky...
READERS WRITE: SEPT. 19

Trump was elected, anonymous writer was not If the senior government official who anonymously penned an op-ed in The New York Times was attempting to reassure me, he failed. President Trump has one thing going for him that this nameless author doesn’t: He was elected. While I fully agree with the picture, painted in both the op-ed and Bob Woodward&rsquo...
Opinion: On Kavanaugh, testimony first; conclusions can follow

We have a closely divided country and a closely divided Senate fighting over a lifetime appointment to a closely divided Supreme Court, and the outcome now rides on decades-old allegations of sexual assault almost certain to defy definitive conclusion. Wonderful. Just wonderful. The wedges that divide us will be driven deeper; our crumbling faith in...
Opinion: Reasoning about race

So much of our reasoning about race is both emotional and faulty. In ordinary, as well as professional, conversation, we use terms such as discrimination, prejudice, racial preferences and racism interchangeably, as if they referred to the same behavior. We can avoid many pitfalls of misguided thinking about race by establishing operational definitions...
READERS WRITE: SEPT. 18

Preacher was right about black-on-black crime The Rev. Jasper Williams, pastor emeritus of Salem Baptist Church, is in deep trouble for decrying the amount of black-on-black crime in Atlanta and the breakup of the black family. Many folks are upset his statement was part of his eulogy for Aretha Franklin, rather than, sadly, that it is true. He has...
More Stories