Opinion: Memo to rural Georgia: Sorry, no


Rural Georgia is in deep trouble, and the attention now being paid to its challenges by state leadership is long overdue.

Lifespans are shrinking; jobs are disappearing. Rural hospitals are struggling to keep their doors open, and health-care professionals and the network they sustain are evaporating. The opioid epidemic is taking a heartbreaking toll, particularly among young men.

Overall, Georgia is one of the fastest-growing states in the country, yet roughly half of Georgia counties are losing population. Those who are fleeing are the young, the talented and the educated, leaving behind a workforce that is far less likely to attract employers.

It’s a slow-moving crisis, and judging from the rhetoric of legislative leaders and Gov. Nathan Deal, they’re ready to step up and try to help.

Except, not really. State leaders are talking about a variety of efforts, such as extending high-speed Internet service to rural communities. They have also proposed the idea of using the tax code to reward those who move to rural areas — basically, the state will be paying people to live there — but that’s of dubious effectiveness and opens a door to use of the tax code that probably ought to stay shut.

But without a doubt, the single most important step that state leaders could take to address the problems of rural Georgia would be to expand Medicaid coverage through the Affordable Care Act. Unfortunately, it’s also the one thing they have said they will not consider.

Medicaid expansion would help rural hospitals stay afloat, and without those hospitals, no tax incentive would ever be large enough to encourage people to move to or retire in those communities. It would finance treatment for drug addiction. By providing insurance to hundreds of thousands of Georgians, it would create and sustain thousands of jobs in small communities across the state and enhance the quality of life in rural areas.

This is not some secret. Everybody knows it. Economic development experts know it. Health-care leaders have been telling that story to elected officials for years now. And while state leaders claim we can’t afford the additional cost, projections show that the billions of dollars in federal resources that would pour into Georgia through Medicaid expansion would largely offset any additional state cost.

The problem, then, isn’t economic or fiscal. It is political. This is an election year, a year in which we choose a new governor and lieutenant governor, setting off a statewide game of musical chairs. Republican hopefuls for higher office have GOP primaries to win. And for all their expressions of concern for rural Georgia and the voters who live there, their higher priority is personal.

So, maybe next year?

Well, this year it’s 2018. The Affordable Care Act was enacted in 2010. Medicaid expansion became operational in 2014. Georgia is one of 18 remaining states that have not accepted expansion, and it has one of the highest uninsured rates in the country. The experience of other states — including Southern states — tells us that the benefits of expansion would be particularly compelling in rural regions, where employer-provided insurance is more rare.

But out of sheer cussedness and political calculation, we are forbidden to reap those benefits here.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Trump, tariffs, tofu and tax cuts

According to early indications, recent U.S. economic growth was full of beans. No, seriously. More than half of America’s soybean exports typically go to China, but Chinese tariffs will shift much of that demand to Brazil, and countries that normally get their soybeans from Brazil have raced to replace them with U.S. beans. The perverse result...
Opinion: What the cave boys teach us about abortion

Twelve boys and their adult coach trapped in a dank, oxygen-deprived cave in Thailand riveted the world’s attention for two weeks. Why, people ask at times like this, are we so focused on these individuals when half a million Rohingya refugee children are in danger of starving on the Bangladesh border, or when 400,000 Yemeni children are severely...
READERS WRITE: JULY 15

ITP Amazon HQ2 win would worsen already-bad traffic Regarding “The quest for Amazon’s HQ2 continues” (Editorial, July 8), each morning I see live TV news broadcasts of endless rows of vehicles creeping along the freeways and, in some cases, not moving at all. Their destination is Atlanta and its environs. A simple observation says...
Opinion: Cruising toward a lost civility

PRINCE RUPERT, Canada – America, you could use a cruise. This thought comes to me as I sit with my family talking lazily over seafood chowder and pizza on the restaurant deck overlooking a pretty harbor here. Bald eagles fish between the sailboats and fishing boats moored below us. Our gleaming white cruise ship, the Seven Seas Mariner, is docked...
Opinion: Is Trump correct Mueller’s appointment was unconstitutional?

WASHINGTON — The president, who might not be fully acquainted with the pertinent Supreme Court case law, says the appointment of Robert Mueller as special counsel was unconstitutional. The president’s opinion, because it is his, is prima facie evidence for the opposite conclusion. It is, however, not sufficient evidence. Consider the debate...
More Stories