Opinion: Decision nears on Gulch plan


As this day’s overall package of editorials and opinion pieces shows, critical topics now rest before the Atlanta City Council. And Atlanta Mayor Keisha Lance Bottoms is a key player in a pair of proposals being urged forward to quick action by entities, including one detailed on another page today by this newspaper’s Editorial board.

In terms of dollars involved, the latest proposal to make something of the underutilized giant hole in downtown known as the Gulch is impossible to ignore. As both writers elsewhere today attest, the Gulch has been a challenge for Atlanta for many decades.

» Opinion: Atlanta should not pass on once-in-a-lifetime opportunity

Anyone who’s crossed downtown bridges and looked down instantly knows why the parcels of weed-choked land are called the Gulch. As earlier development lifted downtown Atlanta streets and building entrances above a busy network of railroad lines, the Gulch came into being.

As early as this Monday, the Council may consider a large package of public incentives to facilitate a private developer’s redevelopment project in the Gulch. The amounts of public money that could be offered could approach $2 billion over time.

As we’ve written here recently, the multibillion-dollar Gulch plan is worthy of careful deliberation, both because it involves a substantial use of public money and it has great potential to remake downtown and adjacent neighborhoods.

» Opinion: Council should take time to get gulch deal right

It’s been also said that a major corporation is eyeing the Gulch as a possible relocation site. It’s been suggested too that the Gulch is in play as part of the secretive effort to lure Amazon’s second headquarters here.

The importance of all those factors makes it all the more important that the Council give due and careful consideration to the proposal. A covered Gulch could be a great plus to Atlanta and beyond, but the project should be worth its public cost. Weighing that is the Council’s rightful role.

Andre Jackson, for the Editorial Board.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: If a prince murders a journalist, that’s not a hiccup

The reports about Jamal Khashoggi, the missing Saudi journalist and Washington Post contributor, whom I’ve known for more than 15 years, grow steadily more sickening. Turkey claims to have audiotape of Saudi interrogators torturing Jamal and killing him in the Saudi Consulate. None of this is confirmed, and we still don’t know exactly what...
Opinion: Kemp, GOP commit voter fraud
Opinion: Kemp, GOP commit voter fraud

Fifty-three-thousand Georgia voters have been placed on “pending” status because data on their voter-registration forms do not match exactly with data in other government databases. However, Secretary of State Brian Kemp — now the GOP nominee for governor — is correct when he reassures those 53,000 Georgians that they can vote...
READERS WRITE: OCT. 17

Conservatives don’t share liberals’ global view In response to “The world has changed; but the GOP hasn’t, and can’t” (Opinion, Oct. 10), Jay Bookman has declared the Trump administration corrupt and incompetent. Conservatives see the Trump administration as a competent answer to the failures of Barack Obama. The...
Opinion: The electoral college debate

Democratic socialist Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, seeking to represent New York’s 14th Congressional District, has called for the abolition of the Electoral College. Her argument came on the heels of the Senate’s confirming Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court. She was lamenting the fact that Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito...
READERS WRITE: OCT. 16

Kavanaugh’s emotions were justified Yes, liberals also were upset about Justice Gorsuch because he is a conservative (“Gorsuch process different for a reason,” Readers Write, Oct. 9). Had Kavanaugh been first, he probably would have received the same treatment as Gorsuch. They are both men with outstanding reputations, as well as...
More Stories