My case for raising the driving age


Your phone rings and you answer. On the other end is a Georgia State patrolman with a message that your teenage son or daughter has been involved in an auto accident. Instantly your world turns upside down, your heart begins to race, your mind speeds through a series of horrible scenarios, and as you struggle to keep your composure, you manage to ask the officer — are they okay? The officer takes a breath and cautiously responds – you need to get to the hospital, and gives you the address and adds, please drive safely.

While many of us hold tightly to a false sense of security that this is not an occurrence that we are likely to experience, unfortunately this is a reality for families everyday. On average between 6 and 13 teenagers die from motor vehicle accidents everyday. Additionally, another 650 to 1,100 teenagers visit emergency rooms everyday with injuries sustained from motor vehicle accidents. In both cases, regardless of details reported in police reports — the proximate cause of injuries and deaths in nearly every accident involving teenagers is the inexperience of teenage drivers. Drivers between 16 and 19 years of age are 3 times more likely than drivers 20 years or older, to be involved in a fatal accident.

The leading contributing factors to teenage motor vehicle accidents are teenage drivers’ inexperience and their underdeveloped decision making skills. When driving, the brain’s frontal lobe plays an enormous role, especially the dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, which is responsible for processing critical data for making rational decisions. This is the part of the brain that tells experienced, mature drivers not to dart across three lanes to make an exit. This is the region of the brain that tells mature and experienced drivers to slow down before taking a deep curve. It tells mature and experienced drivers that turning off your headlights while driving at night is not cool, it’s dangerous and potentially life-threatening. This part of the brain does not fully mature until the age of 20 at the earliest and, according to some professionals, maybe as late as 25 years of age. And this does not contemplate the added impact of mobile technology, texting and social media that today’s young drivers have to contend with.

House Bill 708 proposes to increase the age for obtaining a learner’s permit to 17 years of age. Furthermore, the age for obtaining drivers license will be raised from 17 years old to 18 years old. Additionally, this bill will create opportunities for students to take state-funded drivers education as an elective in public schools.

House Bill 961 will create a constitutional amendment to Georgia’s Constitution dedicating existing fees and assessments to Georgia trauma centers and driver education training courses in public schools. As I speak with families about this issue there are two dominant recurring themes: we need driver’s education back in the schools; and, $400 for a private driver education course is too expensive.

House Bill 961 will ensure that all students have access to driver’s education, regardless of their household income.

These two pieces of legislation are needed to give young drivers more time to mature and more hours of driver education training before they get behind steering wheels. If passed, the new laws will aggravate some teenagers because they will have wait an additional few months to get the keys to the family vehicle. Likewise, I am sure some parents will be frustrated because they will have to chauffeur their teenagers for a few additional months.

I know there will be some pushback. However, I believe safety should be our first priority. At the end of the day, the new laws will save lives. As far as I am concerned, that alone is worth the wait. You can help by contacting your representative and senator and asking them to support these bills and save the lives of our teenagers.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: The king and queen of cruelty

You just can’t construct prisons for babies. You can’t rip children from mothers and fathers. You can’t use the power of the U.S. government to institute and oversee a program of state-sponsored child abuse. You can’t have a system where the process and possibility of reunification is murky and maybe futile. You can’t...
Opinion: But her emails? You’re dang right her emails.

When the Justice Department inspector general’s report revealed that former FBI director James B. Comey had used a personal email account to conduct official business, Hillary Clinton claimed vindication. “But my emails,” she tweeted. Yes, Madam Secretary, your emails. In fact, the overlooked bombshell of the report is the inspector...
Opinion: Assessing trauma’s role in chronic stress, suicide

The alarming increase in suicide rates in the United States over the past two decades is unprecedented and beyond disturbing. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention just released research reporting “suicide increased by 25 percent across the United States from 1999 to 2016 and a shocking 45,000 Americans age 10 or older died by suicide...
READERS WRITE: JUNE 22

Liberal left hypocritical in support of separated kids Those on the liberal left are claiming to be upset with the policy of separating some illegal alien children from their illegal alien parents. They wail it is not the fault of these poor children, so they should be released into our country along with their parents. Over 90 percent of those released...
Opinion: Trump and the invasion of the West

“It is cruel. It is immoral. And it breaks my heart,” says former first lady Laura Bush of the Trump administration policy of “zero tolerance,” under which the children of illegal migrants are being detained apart from their parents. “We need to be … a country that governs with a heart,” says first lady Melania...
More Stories