Atlanta case tests new consumer bureau’s clout


A federal judge in Atlanta soon will rule on a question that could have a profound impact on one of Georgia’s most wide-reaching industries — the companies that process trillions of dollars of credit and debit card payments.

The question: Is Sandy Springs-based Global Payments liable if its automated payments processing system, used by millions of merchants, is also repeatedly tapped into by alleged crooks to steal millions of dollars from their victims?

The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau says it is. And that has industry players and some politicians seeing red over what they view as a federal agency overstepping its limits.

The CFPB, created four years ago in the aftermath of the financial crisis, is acting as “judge, jury and executioner in administering laws it has invented,” former Republican House Speaker Newt Gingrich groused recently in online comments on the issue.

The federal watchdog agency, in a civil lawsuit filed four months ago in the U.S. District Court in Atlanta, went after the ringleaders of an allegedly fraudulent debt collection scheme in metro Atlanta and Buffalo, N.Y. But the CFPB also said Global Payments and four other payments and telemarketing firms that did business with the debt collectors were culpable.

The CFPB lawsuit said the alleged fraud wouldn’t have succeeded if Global Payments and the other companies had properly screened and monitored the debt collectors, and hadn’t given them unfettered access to victims’ bank accounts despite signs of criminal activity.

High levels of customer complaints and reversed charges showed that the debt collectors deserved “a heightened level of scrutiny,” CFPB attorney Jonathan Engel said in a recent hearing in Atlanta. “And yet they were allowed to stick their fingers in people’s checking accounts.”

‘Phantom’ debt

The lawsuit alleges that Mohan Bagga, of Duluth, and Marcus Brown, of Buffalo, N.Y., ran a boiler room operation in which they threatened, harassed and lied to thousands of consumers in order to collect millions of dollars on so-called “phantom” debt. Such debt includes money people never owed or that they no longer legally owe because it was canceled in a bankruptcy or otherwise became outdated.

U.S. District Judge Richard Story ordered an injunction freezing Bagga’s and Brown’s assets while the case is pending. The CFPB complaint also names more than a dozen other individuals and companies.

“The ringleaders of the scheme, the telemarketing firm that broadcast millions of robo-calls, and the companies that processed the payments should all be held accountable for taking advantage of vulnerable consumers,” CFPB Director Richard Cordray said at the time the lawsuit was announced.

The case has the payments industry and critics such as Gingrich up in arms. They view the CFPB’s action as an unprecedented and ill-considered effort to strongarm financial firms into acting as pseudo regulators guarding against consumer fraud.

“The CFPB has discovered that the mere threat of its regulatory authority allows it to pronounce and enforce new rules it has no legal right to create,” Gingrich said late last month in his blog for the Washington Times.

By going after payment processors to cut off financial services to debt collectors and other businesses they don’t like,the CFPB has joined a “chilling” federal enforcement effort called Operation Choke Point, Gingrich said.

“In short, it involves the CFPB conspiring with officials at the Justice Department and FDIC to put law-abiding American companies out of business,” he said.

Seeking dismissal

Global Payments and other firms in the payments industry are trying to get the CFPB’s complaint against them dismissed.

In the recent hearing in Atlanta, lawyers for Global Payments and two other firms argued that the laws the agency is enforcing don’t apply to them because they don’t deal directly with consumers.

The CFBP’s complaint is based on the Consumer Financial Protection Act and the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act.

Global Payments is “four times removed from consumers,” said Doug Baldridge, a Washington, D.C. lawyer representing the company. Global Payments processes 6.5 billion credit and debit card payments a year, he said, but it only deals with merchants.

He told Judge Story that CFPB’s complaint goes too far by arguing that Global Payments is legally liable if criminals use the same services that the company offers to all its clients.

He said it would be hugely costly for Global Payments, which processes transactions for 1.5 million merchants, to ferret out fraud.

“You’re talking about two very small clients … in a sea of other merchants,” said Baldridge. “If you accept that standard, it’s going to add enormous costs to an essentially automated process.”

But Engel, with the CFPB, said Global Payments and the other companies were reckless and harmed consumers by failing to follow their own rules and procedures for vetting new clients and investigating consumer complaints and problem transactions.

“We don’t allege that a big company like Global Payments wanted to harm consumers. But they wanted these merchants to succeed and ignored (problems) to allow them to succeed,” he said. While consumers were losing their money to the debt collectors, Global Payments and the other companies “sent them gift baskets,” he said.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Business

Royal-watching in Marietta: ex-pats and Georgians, tea, vows and ... baps?
Royal-watching in Marietta: ex-pats and Georgians, tea, vows and ... baps?

Sunrise in Marietta was still a few minutes away as the large screen showed a large crowd in a massive London cathedral. In the Queen’s Pantry, tucked into a strip mall near the corner of Johnson Ferry and Roswell roads, nearly 40 people bubbled with eager excitement as they settled in to watch the wedding of Harry and Meghan – who were...
Class action lawsuit filed against SunTrust over recent data breach
Class action lawsuit filed against SunTrust over recent data breach

A class action lawsuit has been filed against SunTrust Bank, over the data breach that left information for 1.5 million of its customers exposed. The complaint filed at the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia said the Atlanta-based company failed to secure and safeguard customers personal and highly private information, and for...
Second airport debate gets spotlight in Paulding commission race
Second airport debate gets spotlight in Paulding commission race

A debate over whether Paulding County should develop metro Atlanta’s second commercial airport is roiling an election for three key county commission seats. If new candidates win seats on the county commission, it has the potential to shift the tide toward commercialization and possibly clear a path toward attracting airline flights. “It...
Chick-fil-A to offer $1.35 million in scholarships in Atlanta
Chick-fil-A to offer $1.35 million in scholarships in Atlanta

Chick-fil-A will award $1.35 million in educational scholarships to 543 of its employees in Atlanta this year. The Atlanta-based company announced a $5.7 million increase in scholarship funds to its employees this year, bringing to $14.5 million the amount to be disbursed to employees across the nation. The funds will help approximately 5,700...
HD Supply: showy building, aggressive growth
HD Supply: showy building, aggressive growth

For a $5.1 billion-a-year company, HD Supply has been a little obscure, but that may be changing. So far this year, the Atlanta-based company – spun off from Home Depot – has plopped down $380 million to buy Hartford-based A.H. Harris, moved into a brand new $100 million headquarters that overlooks I-75, and is looking ...
More Stories