You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myAJC.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myAJC.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myAJC.com.

It’s True, Clinton as senator did want to jail flag burners


One thing has become apparent in the world of President-elect Donald Trump — no incendiary tweet goes to waste.

Just this week, Trump lobbed an early-morning zinger across the globe, opining on Twitter: “Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail!”

The chattering class lit up the morning talk shows. Even some key Republicans said Trump had gone too far. Experts pointed out that flag burning, no matter how distasteful, is protected by the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled it is free speech and a legal form of protest.

Some media outlets complained that Trump was being treated unfairly in the firestorm of criticism that followed. After all, they stated, Democrat Hillary Clinton had also once proposed jail time for flag burners.

“For Clinton supporters, I’m sorry to say you don’t have the high ground again; then-Sen. Clinton co-sponsored the Flag Protection Act of 2005, which carried a 12-month jail sentence to anyone who desecrates the American flag to incite or produce imminent violence or a breach of the peace,” Matt Vespa wrote on the conservative online site Townhall.com.

PolitiFact decided to look into that bit of political history. As it turns out, Clinton did back flag-burning legislation more than a decade ago.

The site Congress.Gov states the Flag Protection Act of 2005 was introduced in the U.S. Senate in October 2005 as Senate Bill 1911. The site summarizes the bill this way:

“Amends the federal criminal code to revise provisions regarding desecration of the flag to prohibit: (1) destroying or damaging a U.S. flag with the primary purpose and intent to incite or produce imminent violence or a breach of the peace; (2) intentionally threatening or intimidating any person, or group of persons, by burning a U.S. flag; or (3) stealing or knowingly converting the use of a U.S. flag belonging to the United States, or belonging to another person on U.S. lands, and intentionally destroying or damaging that flag.”

The bill sets a fine of up to $100,000 and jail time of up to a year for burning a U.S. flag and higher penalties for stealing or damaging one on federal property.

Then-U.S. Sen. Robert Bennett of Utah, a Republican, sponsored the bill. Clinton is listed as one of four co-sponsors. The bill was referred to the Senate Judiciary Committee, where it died.

Political scientists point out that Republicans and Democrats have used the flag-burning issue to their benefit. The courts have ruled, but it still plays well in the court of public opinion where voters reside.

“Both parties have used the flag issue, mostly as political posturing, because everyone knows it is ‘settled law’ and the prospects for change are extremely remote,” said political scientist Kerwin Swint of Kennesaw State University in metro Atlanta. “It’s usually a Republican issue for the GOP base, but in this instance, Hillary Clinton, and other Democratic legislators, got into the act.”

In 1989, the U.S. Supreme Court first established flag burning as a protected First Amendment right in Texas v. Johnson. Back in 1984, Gregory Lee Johnson burned a flag at the Republican National Convention in Dallas in a protest against Ronald Reagan. Johnson was arrested and charged with breaking a state law.

The Supreme Court voted 5-4 in favor of Johnson and against the state of Texas. Johnson’s actions, the majority argued, were symbolic speech, political in nature, and could be expressed even if it upset those who disagreed with him.

“The decisions remain controversial to the present day, and Congress in 2006 attempted to pass a joint resolution to propose an amendment to the Constitution to prohibit flag desecration, which failed by just one vote in the Senate,” states the blog Constitution Daily.

Our ruling

The online site Townhall.com said Hillary Clinton co-sponsored legislation in 2005 that would jail flag burners.

Clinton did indeed co-sponsor a bill that would have done just that. Republicans have backed similar legislation in the past, even though the courts have ruled flag burning is legally protected.

We rate the Townhall.com statement True.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Georgia Politics

What lies ahead for Karen Handel in Washington
What lies ahead for Karen Handel in Washington

Karen Handel punched her ticket to Washington on Tuesday after a hard-fought, four-month race in Georgia’s 6th Congressional District, but she won’t find it easy when she arrives on Capitol Hill. The Republican representative-elect will soon be sworn in as the most junior member of the U.S. House, a position that comes with little...
Watchdog group sues Trump over auto-delete messaging apps
Watchdog group sues Trump over auto-delete messaging apps

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump and his staff are using messaging applications that automatically delete the contents as soon as they're read, according to a Washington-based watchdog group's lawsuit seeking court-ordered compliance with federal records retention laws. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington also asserts...
Senate Republicans unveil health-care bill as GOP struggles to advance its vision
Senate Republicans unveil health-care bill as GOP struggles to advance its vision

WASHINGTON — Senate Republicans on Thursday released a health-care bill that would curtail federal Medicaid funding, repeal taxes on the wealthy and eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood as part of an effort to fulfill a years-long promise to undo Barack Obama's signature health-care law. The bill is an attempt to strike a compromise...
Studies: despair plays part in undiagnosed breast cancer in Georgia
Studies: despair plays part in undiagnosed breast cancer in Georgia

A pair of new studies on breast cancer from Georgia State University point to a surprising medical villain: economic despair. Both of the GSU studies looked at breast cancer that goes undiagnosed for too long. One of the studies by the university’s School of Public Health, on a type of the disease called inflammatory breast cancer, found a cluster...
Study: Atlanta hospital most vulnerable to Medicaid cuts
Study: Atlanta hospital most vulnerable to Medicaid cuts

If the Obamacare revision the U.S. House of Representatives passed in May became law, the Georgia hospital to lose the most Medicaid funding would be Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Hughes Spalding, according to a new analysis by the Georgia Budget and Policy Institute. The U.S. Senate is expected to release its own version of the healthcare...
More Stories