You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myAJC.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myAJC.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myAJC.com.

Judge orders in-state tuition for some immigrants in Georgia

State Board of Regents says it will appeal surprise ruling


In a stunning decision that alters the immigration debate in Georgia, a Fulton County judge has ruled the state must permit residents who have been granted a special reprieve from deportation by the Obama administration to pay in-state tuition at state colleges and universities.

Released Tuesday, the ruling by Fulton Superior Court Chief Judge Gail Tusan says the state has improperly refused to extend in-state tuition to this group, which the federal government has declared “legally present” in this country.

“I really didn’t think we would actually win this because of all the other decisions we had in the past,” said Rigoberto Rivera, a plaintiff and Roswell High School graduate who was brought to the U.S. from Mexico as a child. “We’re so excited here.”

Rivera said he may now apply to Georgia State University to study political science and criminology.

The ruling comes nearly four years after Rivera and fellow plaintiffs began their legal odyssey, which at one point reached the Georgia Supreme Court. But the legal battle is not over.

The Board of Regents issued a statement Tuesday evening, saying it would appeal the judge’s decision. “We believe our policy follows the law,” Charles Sutlive, a spokesman for the board, said in a statement. “As the Superior Court’s decision will remain on hold during the appeals process, our current in-state tuition policy will remain in effect.”

Further, Republican state Sen. Josh McKoon of Columbus reiterated on Tuesday that he would file a countermeasure in the legislative session that starts this month. McKoon’s bill would prohibit anyone without legal status from paying in-state tuition at Georgia’s public colleges. In-state rates are three times — or thousands of dollars — less expensive than out-of-state rates.

Meanwhile, activists on both sides are watching to see whether President-elect Donald Trump will make good on his promise to cancel the Obama administration policy at the heart of the legal dispute in Georgia. Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals, or DACA, grants work permits and temporary deportation reprieves to immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children without authorization.

Ten DACA recipients living in Georgia sued the Board of Regents in Fulton County Superior Court for the ability to pay the in-state rate.

‘A defect of legal justice’

A 2008 state law says noncitizens cannot pay that rate unless they are “legally in this state.” A Board of Regents tuition policy closely tracks that law. The plaintiffs in the case, assisted by local immigration attorney Charles Kuck, pointed to federal records that say DACA recipients are lawfully present in the U.S.

The concept of “lawful presence” is key to the ruling. Judge Tusan wrote that officials of the University System of Georgia are “hereby compelled to perform their duty in applying the federal definition of lawful presence as it relates to students who are DACA recipients and to grant them in-state tuition status.”

Tusan continued, “Defendants have refused to accept the federally established lawful presence of plaintiffs and many other similarly situated students — students who are Georgia taxpayers, workers, and graduates of Georgia public high schools pursuing an affordable option for higher education.

“Such refusal of a faithful performance of their duties is unreasonable and creates a defect of legal justice that has already negatively impacted thousands of Georgia students.”

This is the plaintiffs’ second attempt to reverse the tuition policy for DACA recipients. Last year, the Georgia Supreme Court unanimously rejected their first attempt, saying sovereign immunity — the legal doctrine that protects state agencies from being sued — shields the Board of Regents from such lawsuits.

‘You have to draw a line’

Plaintiff Josafat Santillan cheered Tusan’s ruling. Santillan, a Stone Mountain resident who was granted DACA after coming here from Mexico and overstaying his tourist visa, is studying geography part-time at Kennesaw State University while working full-time at a steel processing plant to help pay for his education. He said he could go to school full-time and finish his degree sooner if he is allowed to pay the in-state tuition rate.

“We knew if we could get the case through all the obstacles that the court would find in our favor,” he said. “It’s been a long time coming.”

More than 28,000 people in the state like Santillan have been granted DACA, federal records show. But it’s unknown precisely how many have graduated from high school and want to pay in-state tuition.

While defending Georgia’s in-state tuition policy last month in Tusan’s courtroom, Senior Assistant Attorney General Russell Willard referred to Trump’s vow to cancel DACA, saying: “There is going to be a new administration in January. And the future of the DACA program is very much in doubt with the incoming administration.”

McKoon, the Georgia state senator from Columbus, said Tusan’s ruling has created new urgency for his legislation. He said his measure would change state law to say only those with “legal status” in the U.S. could pay in-state tuition.

“At a certain point,” he said, “most people would say you have to draw a line in terms of public benefits. And it is a reasonable line to draw to say if you are in the country without lawful status, you should not be conferred taxpayer funded benefits, including in-state tuition.”

‘A very clear ruling’

The ruling has implications for several other related court cases. The Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund has filed two lawsuits in federal court seeking to reverse the tuition policy for DACA recipients as well as a second state rule that bars them from attending some of its top universities. That policy now applies to the University of Georgia, Georgia Tech and Georgia College & State University.

Tusan’s ruling shows DACA recipients should be allowed to attend those universities, said Burth Lopez, a staff attorney for the Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund.

Twenty states allow immigrants without legal status to pay in-state tuition, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures. In addition to Georgia, seven states have been blocking them from attending some or all public colleges and paying in-state tuition. South Carolina, for example, bars them from all of its state colleges and universities.

“The ball is really in their court,” Lopez said of Georgia officials. “They have a very clear ruling as to what the law is and what the law requires and we are expecting them to change their policy.”

Debbie Dooley, a Lawrenceville resident, Trump supporter and a founder of the tea party movement, said she sympathizes with immigrants who were brought to the U.S. as children. But she disagrees with how President Barack Obama started the DACA program and wants Trump to cancel it.

“I think President Obama’s executive action on DACA was unconstitutional because he bypassed Congress,” she said, “and I am going to be urging – and I think there will be a lot of conservatives urging — President Trump to rescind the executive order on DACA.”




Next Up in Georgia Politics

Handel cracks Georgia GOP ‘glass ceiling’
Handel cracks Georgia GOP ‘glass ceiling’

It might not have seemed that way, but the scene at a stuffed Roswell restaurant on the eve of last week’s runoff was a quietly remarkable one. It was the night before the 6th Congressional District vote, and Gov. Nathan Deal was campaigning for a former opponent his staff once described as a spout of “unhinged blather.” Sprinkled...
A new health care debate, Donald Trump, and a spike in breast cancer

Just in time for the renewed, fast-tempo debate over health care in Washington, public health researchers at Georgia State University have produced a pair of studies that help underline just what’s at stake. The more provocative of the two papers has intriguing national implications: In large swaths of the United States, swing areas that handed...
Georgians: Fix health care prices, stop partisanship
Georgians: Fix health care prices, stop partisanship

After the U.S. Senate finally revealed its proposed federal health care bill, advocates revved up their rhetoric with extreme positions, loud cheers and denunciations. “INJUSTICE!” blared the handmade sign of a protester Friday outside U.S. Sen. Johnny Isakson’s office. The Senate’s bill “is morally repugnant,” said...
Will Georgia’s 6th District do this all again in 2018?
Will Georgia’s 6th District do this all again in 2018?

Despite initial relief among Georgia’s 6th District residents that the barrage of campaign ads has come to an end, the reprieve might not last too long. “Now we know what New Hampshire looks like,” said Chip Lake, a GOP consultant based in Georgia. The question is, with 2018 just around the corner, will this year’s astronomical...
Trump signs law making it easier to fire bad VA employees
Trump signs law making it easier to fire bad VA employees

President Donald Trump signed a bill into law Friday that would expedite the process for top officials to fire problematic employees at the long-troubled U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs. The aim of the accountability legislation is to make it easier to root out the bad apples who have helped contribute to the cascade of scandals at the VA, harming...
More Stories