Next Story

Fulton County commissioners update residents on City of South Fulton

Gingrich right: Death used to beat most people to Social Security age


Social Security today is not the program President Franklin D. Roosevelt had in mind when he signed it into law in 1935, according to former Georgia congressman and House Speaker Newt Gingrich.

“We adopted the modern Social Security system at a time when the average person died before they were old enough to get Social Security,” he said during a Dec. 2 interview on “The John Fredericks Show,” broadcast in Virginia.

“We now have some people who are living 50 years on Social Security,” Gingrich said. “Nobody ever tried to design a system like this, and we’re going to have to rethink our whole approach.”

PolitiFact wondered if Gingrich was right about life expectancy falling short of Social Security age in 1935.

The bill signed by Roosevelt offered benefits to retirees when they turned 65.

U.S. life expectancy for a person born in 1935 was just under 62 years, according to records from the federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. On average, girls were expected to live to 64 and boys to 60.

We were curious whether the retirement age was set purposely at 65 to deprive most people of receiving Social Security. Did Roosevelt make this calculation?

“Certainly the Roosevelt administration did not,” said Edward Berkowitz, a professor of public policy at George Washington University and author of several books on Social Security.

“My understanding, that I received from longtime Social Security actuary Robert Myers, was that the age 65 had no particular significance and was chosen because a choice needed to be made and (it) seemed reasonable.”

Myers, who died in 2010, helped to write the Social Security law and in a 1992 memoir offered a simple explanation for how the Roosevelt administration chose the qualifying age for benefits.

“Age 65 was picked because 60 was too young and 70 was too old,” he wrote. “So we split the difference.”

Berkowitz told us that life expectancy at birth - then and now - “is not a good measure of how many people who are working and paying into Social Security will die before age 65.” That’s because the life expectancy average is skewed by infant deaths. After infancy is survived, life expectancy goes up.

That said, we’ll give you one final set of numbers. Average U.S. life expectancy from birth in 2015 was 78.8 years, according to figures just released by the National Center for Health Statistics. It declined from 78.9 in 2014 - the first drop since 1993.

Average life expectancy for men last year was 76.3 years; for women, 81.2.

Our ruling

Gingrich said, “We adopted the modern Social Security system at a time when the average person died before they were old enough to get Social Security.”

We rate his statement True.

For the full fact-check with all sourcing, please see www.politifact.com/virginia/statements/2016/dec/12/newt-gingrich/gingrich-correct-life-expectancy-initially-fell-sh/


Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Georgia Politics

The Right reacts to Graham-Cassidy
The Right reacts to Graham-Cassidy

A roundup of editorials Thursday takes a look at the Graham-Cassidy health care proposal. Will the bill strike the right balance between the federal government’s role in health care and what states will be expected to do? Here are some opinions from the Right. From Roll Call: The problem with the Graham-Cassidy plan is lack of momentum. A majority...
The Left slams Graham-Cassidy health care bill
The Left slams Graham-Cassidy health care bill

A roundup of editorials Thursday takes a look at the Graham-Cassidy health care proposal. Despite a heavy agenda, the bill is likely to come up on the Senate floor next week. Here are some opinions from the Left. 1. Cassidy-Graham is attractive in theory. But it has a giant flaw. From The Washington Post: An experiment in democracy is interesting...
Georgia AG gets 53 forms in probe of voter registration group
Georgia AG gets 53 forms in probe of voter registration group

Fifty-three allegedly forged voter applications are being referred to the state Attorney General’s Office for possible prosecution, a decision by the State Elections Board that effectively closes the Secretary of State Office’s 2014 fraud investigation involving an attention-grabbing registration drive by the New Georgia Project. The...
Battle over the fate of Dreamers flares in Georgia
Battle over the fate of Dreamers flares in Georgia

Jaime Rangel vividly recalls the day the letter arrived five years ago in his family’s mailbox in Chatsworth, an event that prompted his mother to burst into tears. A Mexican native who was brought to America as an infant, Rangel learned from the letter that he had been accepted into the Obama administration’s Deferred Action for Childhood...
Georgia AG gets 53 forms in fraud probe of Stacey Abrams' voter registration group
Georgia AG gets 53 forms in fraud probe of Stacey Abrams' voter registration group

The State Elections Board on Wednesday referred 53 allegedly forged voter applications to the Attorney General’s Office for possible prosecution, essentially closing a 2014 fraud investigation involving a massive registration drive by the upstart New Georgia Project.  The decision allows the office to decide whether to prosecute those involved...
More Stories