You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks


Welcome to

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on

Deal raises concerns for Georgia farmers as ‘water war’ trial nears end

South Georgia farmers, not metro Atlanta lawn-lovers, have been sitting squarely in the legal cross hairs of Florida attorneys over the past month during the “water war” trial expected to conclude this week in this cold and rainy seaport town.

Tuesday, Gov. Nathan Deal unexpectedly jumped into the middle of the legal fray to defend Georgia’s water conservation efforts and warn that court-imposed water reductions would be a “disaster for agriculture.” The governor’s comments were even more surprising given the court’s admonition to Georgia and Florida negotiators to keep confidential their talks aimed at resolving the 27-year-old legal battle between the states.

Indeed, Ralph Lancaster Jr., who was appointed by the U.S. Supreme Court as a special master to resolve the water war, appeared taken aback late Tuesday morning when he asked the lawyers, scientists, environmentalists and others gathered in a bankruptcy court about Deal.

“Do you know what he’s talking about?” Lancaster said aloud. “Just curious.”

The trial entered its fifth week Tuesday with Florida, yet again, trying to tear apart Georgia witnesses defending the state’s conservation and farming practices. It is expected to end this week, whereupon the master will solicit final written arguments from Georgia and Florida before making his decision sometime next month. The nation’s highest court would then consider Lancaster’s decision.

Florida sued Georgia in 2013 claiming the upstream state hoards water from the Chattahoochee and Flint rivers, and adjoining aquifers, to the economic and ecological detriment of the Apalachicola River and bay.

The Sunshine State wants the special master to equitably distribute the water by capping overall water use in Georgia and guaranteeing a healthy flow of river at the Florida line at all times.

The stakes are huge for Georgia: A consumption cap could sharply curtail metro Atlanta’s future development. And southwest Georgia farmers might lose some access to the underground aquifers that water their corn, cotton and peanuts.

Florida’s lawsuit cited “massive” withdrawals of groundwater by the farmers during the last bad Georgia drought, which ended in 2012. A Georgia official, in a pretrial filing, said “there is no doubt that we need a viable management tool to deal with drought in the Flint River Basin.”

Dan Tonsmeire, the Apalachicola Riverkeeper, said after trial Tuesday that “until Georgia gives up on the idea that upstream consumptive use has little to no impact on downstream flows, this fight will never end and the opportunities for resolution will be missed.”

But Sorab Panday, a hydrological expert testifying on behalf of Georgia, said groundwater pumping by farmers has only a “negligible” impact on stream flows across South Georgia and, therefore, isn’t to blame for the paucity of water reaching Florida.

During the 2012 drought, though, Georgia imposed a moratorium on wells tapping the Flint and the underlying Floridan aquifer. Ever-resourceful farmers just dug deeper wells to tap into other aquifers.

Clearly cognizant of the targeted farmers, while also bolstering an economically and politically powerful Georgia lobby, Deal weighed in Tuesday on the trial. In an interview with The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the governor said farmers — not attorneys or judges — should be allowed to make planting decisions “on their own, based on market prices for the commodities they produce.”

“They should not have an artificial process to grow their crops,” the governor said.

Deal also defended the state’s conservation efforts, particularly metro Atlanta’s 10 percent reduction in water usage over the past decade when the population soared by 1 million people.

“We feel we have a very strong case,” he said. “Hopefully, the special master will give due attention to the fact that we’ve not just ignored the issue. We’ve taken proactive steps.”

Deal has largely avoided discussing the water war in public ever since Lancaster, in April 2015, granted both states a “confidentiality order” to keep quiet efforts to mediate the dispute. Lancaster further admonished governors and their attorneys to stop talking to reporters. Deal himself said in April that he was under a gag order due to the litigation.

“Absolutely, there are risks in what the governor is saying, but the special master has already warned that Georgia will not completely get its way in the trial,” said Ryan Rowberry, a Georgia State University professor who worked on behalf of Florida in a previous water war skirmish. “So it’s a political move to get out in front of whatever decision is made and to assure one of the largest business interests in Georgia that he’s got their back.”

Deal, who noted that the trial has already trod agricultural ground, said he was therefore free to discuss some of the case’s details.

“We’ve spent $24 million in legal expenses (this year) to fight this issue and this case,” he said. “That’s a significant investment in taxpayer money. And we’ve done so because I realize the significant consequences that could come from this.”

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Georgia Politics

With vote over, 6th District residents recall the good, bad and ugly
With vote over, 6th District residents recall the good, bad and ugly

They tell stories of obscene gestures and testy run-ins with neighbors that still linger, strained by months of campaigning and sore feelings that won’t soon be forgotten. Others talk of quiet compassion from residents on both sides of the political divide who put aside their differences over the 6th Congressional District race. The most expensive...
Senate health care bill in peril; all eyes on lunch meeting

Senate GOP leaders are bearing down Tuesday in their push to pass a health care bill this week, a day after brutal budget estimates dealt a blow to their proposal. The senators are expected to come together at lunchtime Tuesday to discuss the path forward for the plan and whether they should open official debate on it. Notably, Vice President Mike...
Georgia Court of Appeals rules against Oxendine in ethics case
Georgia Court of Appeals rules against Oxendine in ethics case

Former Georgia Insurance Commissioner John Oxendine lost another round in his court fight to get accusations over his handling of campaign money during his failed 2010 bid for governor dismissed. A superior court judge last year rejected Oxendine’s bid to get the ethics commission complaint dismissed and ruled that the ethics panel should decide...
Senate health plan may leave 680,000 more Georgians without insurance
Senate health plan may leave 680,000 more Georgians without insurance

After two high-profile revisions, the GOP health care plan is still expected to lead to hundreds of thousands more Georgians losing health insurance. The Congressional Budget Office released its score of the Senate plan’s impacts late Monday. The nonpartisan office estimated that 22 million more Americans would be without health insurance at...
Georgia’s Handel takes oath to kick off congressional career
Georgia’s Handel takes oath to kick off congressional career

There was a brief photo-op with U.S. House Speaker Paul Ryan, a few formalities from U.S. Rep. John Lewis, a hug and then an oath. The whole affair took less than half an hour. And just like that, Karen Handel made Georgia history, becoming the state’s first Republican congresswoman. Monday evening’s events on the House floor were a coda...
More Stories