You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myAJC.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myAJC.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myAJC.com.

Why grow a bad program?


Betsy DeVos, our newly confirmed U.S. Secretary of Education, is an ardent, lifelong advocate of voucher programs that take taxpayers’ money out of public schools and use it instead for private school tuition.

We don’t know yet how that support will translate into federal policy, but voucher advocates here in Georgia aren’t waiting to find out. Under bills introduced by two Marietta Republicans, funding for Georgia’s Qualified Education Expense Tax Credit — basically, a poorly disguised voucher program — would be almost tripled, to more than $150 million a year.

Under the program, individuals and corporations that owe taxes to the state are instead allowed to contribute a like amount to private-school scholarship programs. If you donate $10,000 to a “student scholarship organization” for tuition, for example, that’s $10,000 that you don’t have to pay to the state.

Advocates defend that diversion of tax revenue with a familiar argument, claiming that those scholarships give poverty-stricken students an escape route out of failing schools.The truth is that’s not how they work. While states such as Florida do limit such scholarships to students who need financial help, Georgia legislators consistently refuse to adopt that safeguard.

As a result, state data tell us, families from the poorest 25 percent of Georgia households are the least likely economic group to benefit from those scholarships. A substantial majority of those scholarships go instead to households with above-average or upper income. By design — not by accident, but by design — the program serves largely as a sham through which upper-middle-class students get their private-school tuition subsidized by the taxpayers in the name of helping the poor, while the poor themselves get comparatively little help.

Then there’s the lack of accountability, both financial and educational.

Under Georgia law, scholarship organizations can pocket up to 10 percent of what they raise in contributions, which is much higher than in states with similar programs. In Florida, for example, overhead costs have a legal ceiling of 3 percent. So millions of Georgia tax dollars that ought to be going to schools are instead lining the pockets of organization administrators, and for no discernible reason. Tripling the amount of tax credits available would mean a financial bonanza for those groups.

State law also imposes an immense bureaucratic burden on public school teachers and administrators, not to mention high-stakes standardized testing on students. Huge amounts of time and energy better spent on students are consumed in meeting those bureaucratic demands. You know what the state requires of private schools that get tax-subsidized voucher money?

Nothing. We don’t know their graduation rates, their standardized test scores, their curriculum, nothing, and without that data we also have no way of comparing their educational outcomes to those of public school students. Again, that’s not by accident. That’s by conscious design. And if you set up a system in which every failure in the public-school system is fodder for headlines, while the failures of publicly funded but privately run schools are kept secret, public school advocates have every right to wonder whether they are being set up for failure.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Senate listened to student survivors of sexual assault; House mocked them.
Opinion: Senate listened to student survivors of sexual assault; House mocked them.

Sexual assault survivor and law student Grace Starling helped lead the fight against state Rep. Earl Ehrhart’s campus rape bill, which passed the House but failed to advance in a wary Senate. Starling says she learned a lot about politics and power in the process and shares those lessons in a guest column today. Ehrhart said the bill...
Readers Write: March 27

Redistricting should be fair to voters On March 21, in an article in the AJC by Greg Bluestein about opposition to HB 515, House Speaker David Ralston was quoted as saying: “I look for something a little more persuasive than what I’ve been hearings so far today,” he said of Democratic criticism. “The proposals – I&rsquo...
We’re against emotionalism, except when we’re not

Conservatives have rightly taken pride in Neil Gorsuch’s calm and cerebral performance at his Senate confirmation hearings. Many commentators, along with Republican senators, have mocked Democrats for presuming to evaluate Gorsuch based on the outcomes of his cases. Did he “side with the little guy” or with big corporations? The right...
An oasis of liberty in the Arizona sun

PHOENIX — As a boy, Barry Goldwater Jr., son of the former senator and 1964 Republican presidential nominee, would step out of his father’s house and shoot at tin cans 50 yards away. Now 78, he says he could fire in any direction and not endanger “anything but a cactus.” His father, born in 1909 in Arizona territory, three years...
Trump’s chickens finally come home to roost

On Monday, accountability finally arrived for Donald Trump. After 70 years spent largely skating free of consequences for his puerile misbehaviors and diarrheal mouth, he likely found it something of a shock. Seven decades is a long time, after all, and if the so-called president has learned nothing else in those years, he has learned this: Accountability...
More Stories