Readers Write: March 27

Redistricting should be fair to voters

On March 21, in an article in the AJC by Greg Bluestein about opposition to HB 515, House Speaker David Ralston was quoted as saying:

“I look for something a little more persuasive than what I’ve been hearings so far today,” he said of Democratic criticism. “The proposals – I’ve looked at them – and they hurt no member of the House of Representatives at all. Period.”

Speaker Ralston misses the point about opposition to HB 515. Redistricting is not about taking care of legislators, redistricting is not about making sure that politicians are happy. Redistricting needs to become a transparent, fair, rational process that takes care of citizens, of voters, to be sure that we have a competitive system, a system that gives us good choices for those who will represent our interests in the General Assembly.


How can so many dismiss consensus?

How proud would you be if your child was accepted to a prominent university to pursue a career in the sciences? I doubt anyone (politicians and regular folks alike) would be ashamed to say “My son’s a geophysicist at MIT” or “My daughter’s at Caltech studying marine biology.”

Meanwhile, every credible scientist from every credible institution across the academic and research spectrum agrees: climate change is real, it’s serious, and humans are a (if not the) major contributor. You’ll search far and wide to find a credible scientist who disagrees.

So, think about that opening question again. It makes me wonder: how can so many politicians and voters simply dismiss the consensus among so many great minds? They’re not fear-mongering demagogues (like certain people I know), and they’re not gold diggers: they are dedicated research scientists, and you would be proud to rank your own child among them.


Next Up in Opinion

Readers Write: Dec. 11

Founders wrote Constitution to protect ‘God’s law’ Kudos to Cal Thomas for having the courage to write a column (“Our culture needs return to conservative morals,” Opinion, Dec. 2) that lays the blame for America’s current immoral state squarely where it belongs: on America’s rejection of “the laws of...
COMMENTARY: Watch out — Republicans are coming for your benefits

Republicans don’t care about budget deficits, and never did. They only pretend to care about deficits when one of two things is true: a Democrat is in the White House, and deficit rhetoric can be used to block his agenda, or they see an opportunity to slash social programs that help needy Americans, and can invoke deficits as an excuse. All of...
Opinion: Is flirting sexual harassment?

In 2003 a genetics paper revealed that one in 200 men alive in that year was a direct descendant of Genghis Khan (1162-1227). Khan was the Mongol emperor whose armies swept out of the north to conquer pretty much all of Asia. His successors took big chunks of Europe as well. When Marco Polo traveled to China, he met the conqueror’s grandson Kublai...
Opinion: Free speech for me, not for thee

“Our rights come from our creator, and no earthly force can ever take those rights away, and they never will,” said President Donald #Trump during his “Make America Great Again” rally in Pensacola, #Florida. pic...
Opinion: Republicans’ tax wager is worth the gamble

WASHINGTON — The Republicans’ tax legislation is built on economic projections that are as confidently as they are cheerfully made concerning the legislation’s shaping effect on the economy over the next 10 years. This claim to prescience must amaze alumni of Bear Stearns and Lehman Brothers, which were 85 and 158 years old, respectively...
More Stories