Readers Write: March 27


Redistricting should be fair to voters

On March 21, in an article in the AJC by Greg Bluestein about opposition to HB 515, House Speaker David Ralston was quoted as saying:

“I look for something a little more persuasive than what I’ve been hearings so far today,” he said of Democratic criticism. “The proposals – I’ve looked at them – and they hurt no member of the House of Representatives at all. Period.”

Speaker Ralston misses the point about opposition to HB 515. Redistricting is not about taking care of legislators, redistricting is not about making sure that politicians are happy. Redistricting needs to become a transparent, fair, rational process that takes care of citizens, of voters, to be sure that we have a competitive system, a system that gives us good choices for those who will represent our interests in the General Assembly.

PAT BYRD, DECATUR

How can so many dismiss consensus?

How proud would you be if your child was accepted to a prominent university to pursue a career in the sciences? I doubt anyone (politicians and regular folks alike) would be ashamed to say “My son’s a geophysicist at MIT” or “My daughter’s at Caltech studying marine biology.”

Meanwhile, every credible scientist from every credible institution across the academic and research spectrum agrees: climate change is real, it’s serious, and humans are a (if not the) major contributor. You’ll search far and wide to find a credible scientist who disagrees.

So, think about that opening question again. It makes me wonder: how can so many politicians and voters simply dismiss the consensus among so many great minds? They’re not fear-mongering demagogues (like certain people I know), and they’re not gold diggers: they are dedicated research scientists, and you would be proud to rank your own child among them.

MIKE L. FORD, ALPHARETTA




Next Up in Opinion

Readers Write: Aug. 22

We should be reminded of our slave past If I were to visit Germany and be faced with monuments memorializing the likes of Hermann Göring, Joseph Goebbels, Albert Speer, let alone of Adolf Hitler himself, I would be appalled, frightened and nauseated. Germans have recognized the darkest time in their history by memorializing not the proponents...
Opinion: Is the party of Lincoln now the party of Lee?

This year will mark my 30th anniversary as a syndicated columnist. During these years, I have written more words than I would have preferred about race. But race is America’s great moral stain and unending challenge. I’ve tackled school choice, affirmative action, transracial adoption, crime, police conduct, family structure, poverty, free-enterprise...
Readers Write: Aug. 21

Trump completely missing the point You are missing the point, Mr. President. Despite the tragic deaths and injuries in Charlottesville, the point is not the violence. Despite it being the issue that drew the protesters, the statue is not the issue here. The greater concern, Mr. President, is the people who call themselves Americans, who call themselves...
Readers Write: Aug. 20

Where were police in Charlottesville? The recent violence between members of white supremacy groups and those who oppose them was tragic; tragic because it was so predictable. The violence when these groups get together is so frequent, it is a safe assumption that it is inevitable. The question is why in each case the “police are overwhelmed?&rdquo...
Opinion: Tragedy in Charlottesville should unite decent Americans

In the South during the Jim Crow era, the “one-drop rule,” codified into law, asserted that if a person had just one drop of African-American blood, they were considered “black.” I wonder what we’d learn if we gave former KKK leader David Duke and the “white nationalists” who caused havoc in Charlottesville...
More Stories