You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.


  • ePAPER

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks


Welcome to

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on

Readers Write: Feb. 19

Trump shouldn’t invite athletes to White House

President Trump, why don’t you start a new tradition this year and not invite professional sports teams to the White House? You know the media is going to highlight all the negativity, with overpaid, pampered athletes boycotting to show their disrespect of the office of the President. Congratulate your friends on the Patriots in private.

Instead, invite teachers who’ve made a difference, or first responders, police and the families that have lost love ones protecting us.


Cowboy act will backfire on Trump

Old-fashioned Westerns notwithstanding, sometimes acting like the baddest cowboy in the saloon (Trump) doesn’t actually work out so well. As these same movies tell us, sometimes a young, no-name upstart wants to try his hand up against the legendary troublemaker and establish his own reputation. Sometimes the normally sheepish townsfolk don’t actually cower, but form an informal militia to re-establish law and order. Sometimes there’s actually a faster draw in the room. And, of course, you can never forget about possible run-ins with “wild” (read — proud, fearless, and independent) Native Americans.

Case in point, Iran. What a cowboy response they had to Trump’s latest warning. “We don’t need the permission of President Trump to defend the national interests of Iran.” Perhaps these people who cheer on Trump’s tough guy antics can’t even imagine that the citizens and leaders of other nations can be just as nationalistic, just as fearless, and yes, just as stupidly and stubbornly proud as any American in a “Make America Great Again” cap can be. You do not have to have seen more than a couple of old Westerns to be pretty certain that probably more than one national leader is going to take Trump’s blustering bravado as an invitation to see just how much they can taunt and humiliate him by stepping across the “line in the sand.” And one wonders, how many Americans is Trump willing to send down into the canyon against all of the Sitting Bulls of the world.

So maybe Trump will go down in history as the “Dances with Wolves” president. While watching these Wild West dramas of international one-upmanship unfold, you just kinda can’t help pulling for the Native Americans.


Does Bannon see himself in Crusader role?

Not long ago, The Washington Post talked of an “anti-Islamic White House.” E.J. Dionne’s column (“Steve Bannon vs. Pope Francis?,” Opinion, Feb. 10) suggests as though the White House is a crusader citadel now. Bannon’s “Catholic Project” contrasts with Pope Francis’ bridge-building efforts.

Bannon’s “militant church” seeks a fight for “Judeo-Christian” beliefs against Islamic “barbarity” which threatens Western heritage. He must mean “Christian” beliefs, for the old Crusades were Christianity vs. Islam (and Judaism), and the “Judeo-Christian” term is a post-holocaust expression. Bannon’s worldview sees a Judeo-Christian vs. Islam showdown. And “barbarity?” Obviously, Bannon is unfamiliar with the Crusades’ history. As for Western heritage, the Islamic world’s role was most critical in that bequeath.

The “Catholic Project” is reminiscent of “projects” undertaken by Christopher Columbus (1492) and Vasco da Gama (1498). Guided by Papal Bulls, both initiated their eastern missions to “annihilate Muslims and other pagans” and “universalize Christianity.” Indeed, Columbus “prophesied” himself as the “chosen one.” Bannon apparently sees himself in that role.

One would hope that civilization has evolved far beyond the Crusade mindset.


Education revolves around money

In the article about Clark Atlanta University and Georgia Piedmont Tech (“Colleges enter unusual partnership,” News, Feb. 15) the very first goal stated was “students who don’t meet CAU’s academic admissions can take remedial courses…”. Unfortunately the top goal isn’t to educate students — it’s to get more paying students. It’s all about money. And while we are at it, let’s ask why these students can’t meet academic admissions and need to take remedial classes. In spite of having a “diploma,” it appears that they didn’t learn what was required in secondary school and were just “passed on.” In my mind, teachers and administrators failed these students, parents and the community. If they need remedial classes, then the school systems that handed them their diploma should be obligated to re-educate them for free since they didn’t get their money’s worth the first time around.


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Senate listened to student survivors of sexual assault; House mocked them.
Opinion: Senate listened to student survivors of sexual assault; House mocked them.

Sexual assault survivor and law student Grace Starling helped lead the fight against state Rep. Earl Ehrhart’s campus rape bill, which passed the House but failed to advance in a wary Senate. Starling says she learned a lot about politics and power in the process and shares those lessons in a guest column today. Ehrhart said the bill...
Readers Write: March 27

Redistricting should be fair to voters On March 21, in an article in the AJC by Greg Bluestein about opposition to HB 515, House Speaker David Ralston was quoted as saying: “I look for something a little more persuasive than what I’ve been hearings so far today,” he said of Democratic criticism. “The proposals – I&rsquo...
We’re against emotionalism, except when we’re not

Conservatives have rightly taken pride in Neil Gorsuch’s calm and cerebral performance at his Senate confirmation hearings. Many commentators, along with Republican senators, have mocked Democrats for presuming to evaluate Gorsuch based on the outcomes of his cases. Did he “side with the little guy” or with big corporations? The right...
An oasis of liberty in the Arizona sun

PHOENIX — As a boy, Barry Goldwater Jr., son of the former senator and 1964 Republican presidential nominee, would step out of his father’s house and shoot at tin cans 50 yards away. Now 78, he says he could fire in any direction and not endanger “anything but a cactus.” His father, born in 1909 in Arizona territory, three years...
Trump’s chickens finally come home to roost

On Monday, accountability finally arrived for Donald Trump. After 70 years spent largely skating free of consequences for his puerile misbehaviors and diarrheal mouth, he likely found it something of a shock. Seven decades is a long time, after all, and if the so-called president has learned nothing else in those years, he has learned this: Accountability...
More Stories