Readers Write: April 13


Corporations should invest in transportation

Regarding the Watching your Tax Dollars story (“Little-noticed agencies give big tax breaks,” News April 2), I very much appreciate how it calls into question the advantages to taxpayers, and the potential for personal motivations to play a part. One thing that it didn’t mention was the drag on Atlanta’s transportation infrastructure these will cause. It sounds like anathema to suggest that we make it more difficult to bring jobs to Atlanta (or even lose some), but that may be our best course of action considering we are over-capacity already. We no longer live in the 1950s — unemployment will stay at a healthy level in the city, and more jobs means more people moving to the area and commuting to and/or within the city. That is why we hear people saying there are a lot of “transplants” in Atlanta; myself included — we all came here to work. In fact, rather than give corporations tax incentives, it seems it would be wise to require them to invest in our transportation infrastructure as the cost of entry with the goal of them having a “traffic-neutral” impact should they locate/relocate here.

KEVIN CLEARY, BUCKHEAD

State officials complicit in bridge collapse

Thank you for the story of the events regarding the I-85 fire and bridge collapse (“Catastrophe exposes city’s vulnerabilities,” News, April 2). I especially appreciated the mention of the official(s) who allowed storage of flammable materials under the bridge. Without their complicity, the homeless man in question would have ignited only a chair, which would have burned out in minutes with nothing else to combust. The combination of a reckless homeless man and at least one reckless official working for whom — the department of transportation? City? County? — were both required to create this disaster, and both should be called to account for it.

PATRICIA YEARGIN, LILBURN




Next Up in Opinion

Readers Write: Aug. 22

We should be reminded of our slave past If I were to visit Germany and be faced with monuments memorializing the likes of Hermann Göring, Joseph Goebbels, Albert Speer, let alone of Adolf Hitler himself, I would be appalled, frightened and nauseated. Germans have recognized the darkest time in their history by memorializing not the proponents...
Opinion: Is the party of Lincoln now the party of Lee?

This year will mark my 30th anniversary as a syndicated columnist. During these years, I have written more words than I would have preferred about race. But race is America’s great moral stain and unending challenge. I’ve tackled school choice, affirmative action, transracial adoption, crime, police conduct, family structure, poverty, free-enterprise...
Readers Write: Aug. 21

Trump completely missing the point You are missing the point, Mr. President. Despite the tragic deaths and injuries in Charlottesville, the point is not the violence. Despite it being the issue that drew the protesters, the statue is not the issue here. The greater concern, Mr. President, is the people who call themselves Americans, who call themselves...
Readers Write: Aug. 20

Where were police in Charlottesville? The recent violence between members of white supremacy groups and those who oppose them was tragic; tragic because it was so predictable. The violence when these groups get together is so frequent, it is a safe assumption that it is inevitable. The question is why in each case the “police are overwhelmed?&rdquo...
Opinion: Tragedy in Charlottesville should unite decent Americans

In the South during the Jim Crow era, the “one-drop rule,” codified into law, asserted that if a person had just one drop of African-American blood, they were considered “black.” I wonder what we’d learn if we gave former KKK leader David Duke and the “white nationalists” who caused havoc in Charlottesville...
More Stories