Readers Write: April 4

Airline dress policy not draconian

There is too much being made of United Airlines’ decision to enforce its employee/family/retiree travel dress code. I’m a Delta Air Lines retiree and have been aware of, and complied with, Delta’s dress code for pleasure pass travel since the mid-1960s. It is not a draconian policy; it merely sets the bar a little higher than for the general public. The policy is clearly stated in our employment and retiree policy manuals. One ignores it at one’s peril. It is a small price to pay for receiving free or service charge travel. Back in the ’60s, men had to wear a suit and tie and women had to wear a dress. Dress codes evolve over time, thank goodness.


U.S. a nation of both capitalism, socialism

Another letter-writer wrote that helping the poor was socialism, and that Democrats were hypocrites because Democrats support public health care, which is based on Christian principles, but refuse to promote Christianity in taxpayer-funded institutions or public places (“Liberals should make up their minds,” Readers Write, March 26). She seems to assume that only Christianity supports aiding the poor although the vast majority of religions do, and a great many non-religious people do as well.

Separation of church and state requires us to protect religion without favoring one over another. Socialism is the means by which we pool our money to fund things we need but could not afford otherwise. Our country has always mixed socialism with capitalism, which encourages and rewards private enterprise and private ownership of businesses and property.

Without socialism, we would not have the most powerful military in the world, public education, a public mail service, public fire and police protection.

We may disagree about what makes sense to spend our taxes on and what does not, and that’s OK. That’s not communism, nor is it theocracy. It’s democracy.


Next Up in Opinion

Readers Write: Aug. 22

We should be reminded of our slave past If I were to visit Germany and be faced with monuments memorializing the likes of Hermann Göring, Joseph Goebbels, Albert Speer, let alone of Adolf Hitler himself, I would be appalled, frightened and nauseated. Germans have recognized the darkest time in their history by memorializing not the proponents...
Opinion: Is the party of Lincoln now the party of Lee?

This year will mark my 30th anniversary as a syndicated columnist. During these years, I have written more words than I would have preferred about race. But race is America’s great moral stain and unending challenge. I’ve tackled school choice, affirmative action, transracial adoption, crime, police conduct, family structure, poverty, free-enterprise...
Readers Write: Aug. 21

Trump completely missing the point You are missing the point, Mr. President. Despite the tragic deaths and injuries in Charlottesville, the point is not the violence. Despite it being the issue that drew the protesters, the statue is not the issue here. The greater concern, Mr. President, is the people who call themselves Americans, who call themselves...
Readers Write: Aug. 20

Where were police in Charlottesville? The recent violence between members of white supremacy groups and those who oppose them was tragic; tragic because it was so predictable. The violence when these groups get together is so frequent, it is a safe assumption that it is inevitable. The question is why in each case the “police are overwhelmed?&rdquo...
Opinion: Tragedy in Charlottesville should unite decent Americans

In the South during the Jim Crow era, the “one-drop rule,” codified into law, asserted that if a person had just one drop of African-American blood, they were considered “black.” I wonder what we’d learn if we gave former KKK leader David Duke and the “white nationalists” who caused havoc in Charlottesville...
More Stories