Opinion: The first thing Atlanta needs to do about housing affordability


Atlanta has a problem with housing affordability. The city’s new mayor, Keisha Lance Bottoms, campaigned on spending $1 billion to address the problem.

A fat lot of good even that large a sum will do, though, if the biggest threat to affordability isn’t solved in a very real way.

Recall last summer, when homeowners across Fulton County felt ill at the sight of their property reassessments. About half saw their assessments rise by at least 20 percent. For about a quarter, the increase was more than 50 percent. (Full disclosure: This Atlanta homeowner’s assessment rose by almost 150 percent.)

County commissioners froze values at 2016 levels, a politically popular but legally questionable maneuver. In any case, the freeze was never going to last beyond 2017. It will take a permanent solution to keep homeowners from getting slammed with an even bigger increase this year.

Legislators for cities in north Fulton have already sprung into action, working on a bill to cap the amount of increase homeowners can face in a single year to 3 percent or the rate of inflation, whichever is lower. The key, says Rep. Jan Jones, R-Milton, is not just to keep property taxes lower than they might otherwise be, but more predictable as well.

“When a purchaser decides to buy a house, they know how much their income is, and how much their mortgage and taxes will be, and can decide, ‘I can afford that,’” Jones says.

But she and other north Fulton lawmakers can only touch the portions of the tax levied by their cities and the county school system. They can’t do it for Atlanta or its school system since they don’t represent that city.

I’m told the Atlanta delegation is working on a similar bill. Here’s why it’s imperative they succeed.

First is just a matter of need. A map of the largest percentage increases in the county last year shows the most concentrated areas of soaring assessments were in Atlanta. And not just in the high cotton of Buckhead: Huge swaths of southwest Atlanta in particular saw increases of 30 percent, 40 percent, even 50 percent or more.

As a matter of principle, it’s abominable that many residents might have to sell their homes because of their tax bills. Unlike other taxes, one’s property tax is based largely on others’ decisions. Here’s what I mean: If I buy more goods, I pay more sales tax. If I earn more money, I pay more income tax. Those are choices I made. But if my neighbor sells his house for a lot more than I paid, my own property taxes may increase, even if I have no more money than before.

But the more immediate problem is that matter of housing affordability.

It’s bad enough that it’s harder and harder for middle-income folks to find homes in Atlanta they can afford — especially homes in good school zones. Relatively affordable areas also are often the very places where home prices are likely to rise the most. That can render a once-affordable home unaffordable.

What good will it do Atlanta to spend $1 billion on affordable housing if soaring property assessments force even more residents to flee the city? Remember, the near suburbs in most cases already have lower millage rates. If they also are willing to cap how fast assessments can rise, they’ll become even more attractive.

Of course, that will create other problems, from a further hollowing out of the city’s middle class to the need to spend even more on transportation infrastructure to handle even more people with long commutes. The attendant costs would quickly dwarf any lost revenue from a cap.

If Atlanta is to make the city a more affordable place to live, recognizing the need not to tax people out of their homes is the best place to start.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

READERS WRITE: FEB. 21

Police chiefs back Ga. justice reforms The Georgia Association of Chiefs of Police express their appreciation and support of Gov. Nathan Deal’s criminal justice reform efforts, which have helped to reduce the overall crime rate in Georgia by 24 percent. Accountability Courts addressing special areas, including drugs, mental health, and veterans&rsquo...
The right is looking for an honest debate on guns
The right is looking for an honest debate on guns

The way to keep our children safe is clear – shoring up our school security and getting better at spotting disturbed kids. Anything else is wasting time. A roundup of editorials Tuesday takes a look at the issue.Opinions from the Right:When hurting kids and parents have bad ideas: Addressing post-shooting activism From Townhall: Make schools...
The left has a solution for mass shootings – don’t sell the weapons the shooters use
The left has a solution for mass shootings – don’t sell the weapons the shooters use

The way to stop mass shootings is to restrict the sale of assault weapons. It’s the only thing that makes sense. A roundup of editorials Tuesday takes a look at the issue.Opinions from the left:On gun violence, we are a failed state From columnist E.J. Dionne: When will we stop letting the NRA decide if our children will be protected at school?...
Opinion: Will automation kill our jobs?

A recent article in The Guardian dons the foreboding title “Robots will destroy our jobs — and we’re not ready for it.” The article claims, “For every job created by robotic automation, several more will be eliminated entirely. … This disruption will have a devastating impact on our workforce.” According to...
READERS WRITE: FEB. 20

Mental health stigma carries steep price I write this with tears of grief and frustration. Running a nonprofit counseling center over the past 10 years, I have been saddened to witness repeated events like Parkland, followed by anguished vows to “do more about mental health.” Why, then, did an effort to approve Medicare (and probably Medicaid)...
More Stories