Opinion: Ossoff’s false attack on Handel and women’s health


You knew it was coming. But you might have expected it to be a little more honest, or at least clever.

“It” is the Jon Ossoff campaign’s dredging up of GOP opponent Karen Handel’s brief tenure at the Susan G. Komen organization. It comes in a new ad featuring a Smyrna OB-GYN who says Handel “cut off funding for Planned Parenthood cancer screenings” while at Komen. “I don’t usually get involved in politics,” she says, “but as a doctor and a breast cancer survivor myself, what Karen Handel did is unforgivable.”

The doctor may not be just another truth-twisting politico, but she plays one on TV.

The controversy dates back to 2012, when Komen decided to stop providing grants to Planned Parenthood. The $600,000 in question was a rounding error: It represented about seven-tenths of 1 percent of Komen’s grants at the time, and less than seven-hundredths of 1 percent of Planned Parenthood’s total revenues. But culture warriors on the left defend nothing more fiercely than the nation’s leading provider of abortions, and their attack on Komen was coordinated and effective. Within a week, Handel had resigned as Komen’s vice president for public policy.

Since then, there has been much examination of why exactly Planned Parenthood deserves grants from a breast cancer-awareness organization, or righteous indignation if the grants go away. The conclusion is clear: It doesn’t.

Start with a fact hardly ever acknowledged about this episode: In no way would cutting ties with Planned Parenthood have reduced Komen’s funding for breast-cancer screenings. Period. Had Komen stuck with its decision instead of caving to PP’s PR onslaught and reversing its policy, the money in question would have gone to other service providers. That almost certainly would have helped Komen pay for far more effective breast-cancer screening.

Fact-checkers have verified time and again that Planned Parenthood does not provide mammograms. Politifact in 2012 rated a statement to that effect by Handel herself as true. The Washington Post on a couple of occasions has awarded three (of a possible four) “Pinocchios” to supporters of Planned Parenthood, including Barack Obama, for claiming it offers mammograms.

What Planned Parenthood provides are clinical breast exams, in which doctors check patients for lumps by hand. To call this practice a “cancer screening,” as in the Ossoff ad’s script, is quite a stretch. The American Cancer Society does not recommend these exams because “research has not shown a clear benefit of physical breast exams done by either a health professional or by yourself.” (Interestingly, Planned Parenthood’s website acknowledges this shortcoming of self-examinations, but ignores the research on the kind it provides.) The National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention echo the lack of evidence supporting the exams and instead focus on when women should have the more reliable mammograms.

In effect, the “screening” performed by Planned Parenthood amounts to … telling women they should go get screened. Maybe that’s why fewer and fewer women concerned about breast cancer rely on Planned Parenthood: In its most recent annual report, the organization reported 43 percent fewer breast-cancer exams than it performed just three years earlier.

These facts are not in dispute, yet Jon Ossoff is the latest leftist to ignore the truth here. That’s only surprising if you believe him when he shows up on your TV claiming to be something else.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Election’s teaching divisiveness in schools
Opinion: Election’s teaching divisiveness in schools

Whatever you think of him, Donald Trump has irrevocably altered America. That includes education, and not just by putting Betsy DeVos in charge of it. He has also changed the experience of education. I’m a senior at Wheeler High School in east Cobb. Over the past year, I’ve seen a shift in how kids interact. Everything has become more tense...
Opinion: Thoughts toward ending America’s ‘Water Wars’

Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court tried to end not one but two interstate water wars. One, between Texas, New Mexico, and Colorado, argues that New Mexico has violated a 1938 agreement by over-pumping groundwater, while the other, between Florida and Georgia, argues that Georgia’s breakneck development has slowed the flow of water to...
Opinion: What’s good for Amazon is good for the gander

Amazon this past week eliminated 218 cities from its HQ2 sweepstakes, and Atlanta wasn’t one of them. Instead, Atlanta made the 20-city “short list” of candidates still in the hunt for a $5 billion investment and 50,000 high-paying jobs. Celebration is not only premature but a bit unseemly. There’s a long way to go, and it would...
Opinion: Settling ‘Water Wars’ still best solution

Two, and sometimes three, states have been here before. This newspaper’s essentially written this editorial before. Yet the water wars continue with a latest round of courtroom maneuvering in the decades-long battle over the water system that supplies Georgia, Florida and Alabama. Earlier this month, the U.S. Supreme Court heard arguments in...
Opinion: Memo to rural Georgia: Sorry, no
Opinion: Memo to rural Georgia: Sorry, no

Rural Georgia is in deep trouble, and the attention now being paid to its challenges by state leadership is long overdue. Lifespans are shrinking; jobs are disappearing. Rural hospitals are struggling to keep their doors open, and health-care professionals and the network they sustain are evaporating. The opioid epidemic is taking a heartbreaking toll...
More Stories