Opinion: Ossoff’s false attack on Handel and women’s health


You knew it was coming. But you might have expected it to be a little more honest, or at least clever.

“It” is the Jon Ossoff campaign’s dredging up of GOP opponent Karen Handel’s brief tenure at the Susan G. Komen organization. It comes in a new ad featuring a Smyrna OB-GYN who says Handel “cut off funding for Planned Parenthood cancer screenings” while at Komen. “I don’t usually get involved in politics,” she says, “but as a doctor and a breast cancer survivor myself, what Karen Handel did is unforgivable.”

The doctor may not be just another truth-twisting politico, but she plays one on TV.

The controversy dates back to 2012, when Komen decided to stop providing grants to Planned Parenthood. The $600,000 in question was a rounding error: It represented about seven-tenths of 1 percent of Komen’s grants at the time, and less than seven-hundredths of 1 percent of Planned Parenthood’s total revenues. But culture warriors on the left defend nothing more fiercely than the nation’s leading provider of abortions, and their attack on Komen was coordinated and effective. Within a week, Handel had resigned as Komen’s vice president for public policy.

Since then, there has been much examination of why exactly Planned Parenthood deserves grants from a breast cancer-awareness organization, or righteous indignation if the grants go away. The conclusion is clear: It doesn’t.

Start with a fact hardly ever acknowledged about this episode: In no way would cutting ties with Planned Parenthood have reduced Komen’s funding for breast-cancer screenings. Period. Had Komen stuck with its decision instead of caving to PP’s PR onslaught and reversing its policy, the money in question would have gone to other service providers. That almost certainly would have helped Komen pay for far more effective breast-cancer screening.

Fact-checkers have verified time and again that Planned Parenthood does not provide mammograms. Politifact in 2012 rated a statement to that effect by Handel herself as true. The Washington Post on a couple of occasions has awarded three (of a possible four) “Pinocchios” to supporters of Planned Parenthood, including Barack Obama, for claiming it offers mammograms.

What Planned Parenthood provides are clinical breast exams, in which doctors check patients for lumps by hand. To call this practice a “cancer screening,” as in the Ossoff ad’s script, is quite a stretch. The American Cancer Society does not recommend these exams because “research has not shown a clear benefit of physical breast exams done by either a health professional or by yourself.” (Interestingly, Planned Parenthood’s website acknowledges this shortcoming of self-examinations, but ignores the research on the kind it provides.) The National Cancer Institute and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention echo the lack of evidence supporting the exams and instead focus on when women should have the more reliable mammograms.

In effect, the “screening” performed by Planned Parenthood amounts to … telling women they should go get screened. Maybe that’s why fewer and fewer women concerned about breast cancer rely on Planned Parenthood: In its most recent annual report, the organization reported 43 percent fewer breast-cancer exams than it performed just three years earlier.

These facts are not in dispute, yet Jon Ossoff is the latest leftist to ignore the truth here. That’s only surprising if you believe him when he shows up on your TV claiming to be something else.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Trump finds the seam, drives the wedge
Opinion: Trump finds the seam, drives the wedge

  (AP) One of the great inherent powers of the presidency is its power to set the national agenda — “the bully pulpit,” as Teddy Roosevelt called it. So when Donald Trump gazed across the political landscape, at difficult, complex issues such as North Korea, the devastation of Puerto Rico and the recovery...
Readers Write: Sept. 26

Results of nuclear war beyond imagination For anyone (particularly Kim Jong Un of North Korea) that might be contemplating a nuclear war, they should read the book written by Pat Frank, titled “Alas, Babylon” and published by Harper Perennial in 1993. This book (although fictional) rather clearly intimates what the civilization of the world...
Opinion: President Trump vs. the NFL is peak 2017
Opinion: President Trump vs. the NFL is peak 2017

Falcons owner Arthur Blank joins arms with his players during the playing of the national anthem prior to the game against the Detroit Lions on Sunday in Detroit. (Leon Halip / Getty Images) There is no redeeming quality to the unfolding war of words between President Trump and professional football players. It is a duel...
The Right gives Trump the win in national anthem protests
The Right gives Trump the win in national anthem protests

A roundup of editorials Monday looks at how fans booed the players who did not stand for the anthem, how liberals don’t get Joe and Jane Sixpack and why the players, owners and Commissioner Roger Goodell should be ashamed of themselves. Here are some opinions from the Right. 1. Trump wins when the NFL takes a knee From The Daily Caller:...
Trump is nothing more than a racist provocateur, according to the Left 
Trump is nothing more than a racist provocateur, according to the Left 

A roundup of editorials Monday looks at how President Donald Trump insists on stirring the racial pot, how the player who sparked the protest won the day and how the president holds a “slave master-like obsession” with attacking blacks. Here are some opinions from the Left. 1. Trump keeps fanning racial flames From the Ashbury Park...
More Stories