Opinion: Government of the rich, by the rich, for the rich

This is an administration of the rich, by the rich and for the rich. In fact, Americans have not seen an administration this blatantly tilted toward the interests of the wealthy in at least a hundred years, if ever.

And while that’s remarkable in its own right, it’s even more so when you consider the context:

1.) This administration has come to power in an era when wealth is already highly concentrated and income inequity is at record high levels. Look around you. The stock market has never been higher. Corporate after-tax profits have never been higher. The amount of wealth concentrated among the top one percent and top 0.1 percent has never been higher, at least not in modern times. Yet in every way imaginable — through regulatory changes, through tax policy, through the people it has placed in positions of power — this administration is implementing policies intended to make those inequities worse, not better, to make the powerful more powerful still.

2.) Furthermore, this is coming from an administration and a president elected on the explicit promise that it would take the side of the forgotten little man and woman against Wall Street, transnational corporations and the powerful establishment. That was the promise; that was the contract affirmed and witnessed in Trump rallies all across the nation. By doing the exact opposite, by tightening the ties linking Washington to Wall Street, it is perpetrating a bait-and-switch scam on a scale seldom if ever witnessed in American politics.

You may recall that during the campaign, the American people were promised cheaper, better health care for everyone. What they got instead was a plan that would have stripped insurance from 20 million to 30 million Americans, with the money saved going to the wealthy in the form of tax cuts.

They were also promised over and over again by Donald Trump that foundational programs such as Medicaid and Medicare would not be touched, that their budgets would be sacrosanct. Instead, they have witnessed repeated underhanded efforts to strip hundreds of billions of dollars from those programs, with the proceeds again earmarked for the already rich.

They also heard heartfelt promises to address the opioid crisis that is killing tens of thousands, but have gotten nothing but proposed cutbacks in the few treatment programs that already exist. They were promised a major infrastructure investment program, and got nothing. They were warned that firms such as Goldman Sachs exemplified the establishment that was rigging the system against them, then saw the entire economic policy-making structure handed over to top Goldman Sachs officials.

They — you — were also promised a middle-class tax cut. Instead — and every nonpartisan analysis of the legislation has come to this very same conclusion — you’re getting a bill dominated by tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy, a bill in which the relatively small tax cuts for the working and middle class are temporary, while those that benefit big business are made permanent.

By 2027, according to the Congressional Budget Office, 65 percent of American households — the poorer 65 percent — will be losing money and will suffer from a diminished standard of living as a consequence of this bill. By 2027, the top 35 percent will still be benefiting handsomely. It is almost unbelievable that in times such as these, a bill like this could be so close to becoming law.

Yet there it is.

Reader Comments ...

Next Up in Opinion

Opinion: Some next steps toward fighting opioid abuse in Ga.
Opinion: Some next steps toward fighting opioid abuse in Ga.

A new season of A&E Network’s Emmy Award-Winning docu-series aired earlier this month. For many Georgians, the opening scenes – which include shots of Newtown Dream Dog Park, Marietta Square, and North Springs MARTA station - are familiar. Unfortunately, this is not a television production lured to Georgia by our competitive film tax credit...
Readers Write: Jan. 23

Left just as guilty of not compromising I had a chuckle as I read E.J. Dionne’s opinion piece (“Trump stumbles upon the truth of political posturing,” Opinion, Jan 12). He writes that “what were once widely seen as moderate, commonsense solutions are pushed off the table by a far right that defines compromise as acquiescence...
The right claims the left has chosen Dreamers over every other American
The right claims the left has chosen Dreamers over every other American

The right places the blame for the shutdown squarely on the Democrats and warns that voters may do the same in November. A roundup of editorials Monday takes a look at the shutdown. From the National Review: Republicans should agree to a limited DACA deal as long as they get one on chain migration and E-Verify. The Washington Examiner: How can Democrats...
Will the left be blamed for the government shutdown?
Will the left be blamed for the government shutdown?

As the government shutdown enters its third day, the left warns that come November midterms, voters will remember who stood for what. A roundup of editorials Monday takes a look at the shutdown. From The New Yorker: Why is the Dreamer issue tied to the shutdown? Because the fight isn’t over the budget, it’s about who will be let into the...
Opinion: What is the real message of #MeToo?

The feminist website Babe published an account of a date gone bad. The pushback has been swift and sharp. I share some of the concerns of the critics, but I also think young women are sending a message that is being missed. The account by the anonymous “Grace” about a bad date with comedian Aziz Ansari was, if not “3,000 words of...
More Stories