OPINION: Friedman’s right man to be U.S. Ambassador to Israel


I recently had the opportunity to meet David Friedman, President Trump’s nominee to be America’s next ambassador to Israel.

I was impressed by this brilliant and passionate man, an observant Jew, a fluent Hebrew speaker (he read my necklace that has my name in Hebrew), who has the values crucial to our important Israeli ally. This is critical to re-establish American leadership in the Middle East.

Friedman is a successful bankruptcy lawyer, son of a rabbi, with a long relationship to, and deep knowledge of, Israel.

Friedman was just cleared by the Senate Foreign Relations committee by a 12-9 vote, with only one Democrat, Bob Menendez of New Jersey, supporting him. In all likelihood, because of the Republican majority in the Senate, Friedman will get confirmed. But most Democrats will oppose him.

Why the partisan politics regarding this good man?

Democrats don’t like Friedman’s past positions opposing the creation of a Palestinian state and his support of Israeli settlements. According to Senate Foreign Relations committee Democrat Benjamin Cardin, Friedman’s positions undermine his credibility to be a “facilitator for a level playing field negotiation for a two-state solution.”

The driving distance is about the same from the border of the Palestinian state that Cardin wants to Tel Aviv as from Capitol Hill to the border of Cardin’s state of Maryland. I wonder if Cardin would be anxious to have a half hour from his border an independent nation with a history of violence and terrorism that refuses to recognize the legitimate existence of his home.

Freedom House in Washington, D.C., a nonpartisan group that rates freedom in countries around the world — evaluating political rights and civil liberties — grades countries from 1 to 7, with 1 being most free. Israel is among the freest nations in the world, receiving a grade of 1.5. The Palestinian Authority received the lowest possible grade, 7, dropping from a 6 rating of last year.

Not only is the Palestinian Authority an ongoing security threat for Israel, it embodies none of the values Americans cherish.

Yet, in a Gallup poll of a few weeks ago, 82 percent of Republicans expressed more sympathy for Israel than for the Palestinians, compared with only 47 percent of Democrats.

If most Democrats are not more sympathetic to a nation that shares American values than one that does not, what exactly is the Democratic Party about? More perplexing, Democrats blindly support creating another undemocratic Muslim state to add to the massive problems we already have in that region.

According to U.N. Watch, in 2016 the U.N. General Assembly adopted 20 resolutions against Israel and only six resolutions on the rest of the world combined, with three on Syria, one each on Iran, North Korea and Crimea.

American foreign policy, particularly in the Middle East, is badly in need of a wake-up call.

Our ally Israel, one small and lonely democracy in a hostile Middle East, is badly in need of clear, America support.

David Friedman is the right man to represent America in Israel, and I look forward to his confirmation.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

READERS WRITE: FEB. 20

Mental health stigma carries steep price I write this with tears of grief and frustration. Running a nonprofit counseling center over the past 10 years, I have been saddened to witness repeated events like Parkland, followed by anguished vows to “do more about mental health.” Why, then, did an effort to approve Medicare (and probably Medicaid)...
The left has news for the president: The indictment of 13 Russians shouldn’t make you comfortable
The left has news for the president: The indictment of 13 Russians shouldn’t make you comfortable

Robert Mueller’s indictments of more than a dozen Russians are a good thing, but it’s just a start. A roundup of editorials Monday takes a look at the issue. 1. As Robert Mueller Fights Russian Meddling, Trump Is MIA From USA Today: What’s missing in the news of indictments of Russians for meddling in U.S. elections is some leadership...
The right wants to know where the left was on gun control when they had the White House
The right wants to know where the left was on gun control when they had the White House

The right wants to know where the left was on gun control when they had the White House As Democrats condemn the right for doing nothing after mass shootings, Republicans ask why the left did not pass another assault weapons ban when they were in charge. A roundup of editorials Monday takes a look at the issue. 1. Democrats, Spare Me Your Hypocrisy...
READERS WRITE: FEB. 19

Writer wrong to protect only one viewpoint The writer of “More than one side of speech worth protecting” (Readers Write, Feb. 11) makes a good point about free speech protection and government’s imposition on it, and then he ruins his argument by making it about conservative speakers on college campuses who are shouted down by audience...
Opinion: Mass killers should be denied notoriety they crave

An orgy of mutual disgust now greets every mass shooting in America. Liberals despise conservatives who, they predict, will offer only insipid “thoughts and prayers” in the face of what they conceive to be preventable massacres. Conservatives scorn liberals who, they believe, will propose “feel-good” gun measures that would...
More Stories