You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myAJC.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myAJC.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myAJC.com.

Opinion: Free speech is embattled, misunderstood


The prolonged hubbub surrounding Gwinnett County Commissioner Tommy Hunter, calling U.S. Representative John Lewis a “racist pig” on Hunter’s Facebook page, is a symptom of our societal breakdown around the First Amendment in a battle to determine whether freedom of thought will survive when pitted against a new generation who are unwilling to debate or resolve issues, choosing bureaucratic intrusion and litigation instead.

Curiously, Rep. Lewis has remained silent, dealing with his own foibles like disobeying Congressional rules by staging a sit-in at the House chamber and lying on national television about his inaugural attendance.

Hunter did admit to a poor choice of words.

Certain people have called for Hunter’s resignation because of his opinions expressed on his personal Facebook page. Being offensive is protected speech as long as the person is not threatening or violent, and surely our society’s ability to tolerate such is the seal and guarantee of a truly free nation.

Representative Maxine Waters of California referred to the Trump team and cabinet as a “bunch of scumbags” on MSNBC. An outrageous statement, but should she resign?

With micro-aggressions, trigger warnings, safe spaces and intellectual censorship, we are becoming a nation so weak, void of self-esteem, risk-averse and so starving for validation that our personal freedom of expression is being pilfered.

Universities are using authoritarian means to force an artificial harmony and civility on campuses using bias detection systems that encourage students to report fellow students and faculty who say things they believe to be offensive. Some campuses have tiny mandatory “free speech zones,” obviously indicating that free expression is banned on the remainder of the campus.

The University of Northern Colorado actually warned students not to say “All lives matter.” Likewise, University of Wisconsin campuses discouraged students from saying “illegal immigrant,” or “illegal alien” and “politically correct.”

Some of us can remember roughly 50 years ago the protests on college campuses for civil rights and opposing the Vietnam War, a time when the answer to offensive speech was rebuttal with more free speech. However, today we see the rapid decline, with Emory University students citing “genuine concern and pain” when encountering Donald Trump’s name written in chalk on the sidewalk.

A Chief Judge of the Appalachian Judicial Circuit threw a local media publisher and his attorney in jail and fined them for wanting to openly report on judicial proceedings. The judge was quoted saying, “I don’t react well when my honesty is questioned.”

Rhode Island Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse wants to use the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) statute, created to prosecute the mafia, to bring civil lawsuits against companies that fund climate research and reporting of which he disapproves.

Climatologist and former chair of the School of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences at Georgia Tech Judith Curry resigned over pressure regarding her ongoing statements over man-made climate change and the uncertainties and deficiencies of climate modeling. Others in climate science are meeting the same fate. The intolerance over freedom of scientific thought is astounding.

Naturally, if we are not a free people and forfeit the right of freedom of expression, eliminating the First Amendment, then our society is saddled with the burden of determining by what subjective standard we shall adhere to. and who gets to select that new standard? Acting as the bias police, Hunter’s critics commit the same offense by referring to him as “coward” and “chicken” in public meetings.

The main function of a constitution is authorizing restraint on government. Our current state of affairs has us crying foul whenever someone uses words that hurt our feelings, calling for government action to correct whatever is subjectively determined bias.

Sadly, we are creating an Orwellian nanny-state where people have been led to believe that they have the right to not be offended, but at the same time they claim to believe in freedom of speech. The two are not compatible.

Fayette County had an issue similar to the Hunter situation where a commissioner made offensive comments toward a specific group on Facebook and in a public meeting. As the chairman at the time, I was chided for allowing the commissioner to spew the offensive comments uninterrupted. My response was simply that the commissioner had the right of free speech and the constituents deserved to hear the views of their elected official.

The commissioner was not re-elected by the informed voters. Had he been forced to suppress those views, but still believing them, he might have been re-elected. Thus, free speech works.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

New study: Black girls as young as 5 seen as less innocent than white peers
New study: Black girls as young as 5 seen as less innocent than white peers

A study released today by Georgetown Law’s Center on Poverty and Inequality finds black girls are regarded as older and less innocent than white counterparts, a bias that particularly affects girls between the ages of 5 and 14. The study says this “adultification” may contribute to the disparate discipline of black girls in schools...
Opinion: Another question raised about estimate of Senate health bill
Opinion: Another question raised about estimate of Senate health bill

Sen. Marco Rubio speaks with reporters on Tuesday. (AP Photo / J. Scott Applewhite) WASHINGTON — The big news this week turned out not to be a health-care vote on Thursday or Friday, but the concession by GOP Senate leadership on Tuesday that they don’t yet have the votes for the bill and won’t bring it to the floor before the July...
Medicaid’s rise symbolic of liberals’ welfare state run amok

The number of Americans enrolled in Medicaid has increased from 29 million in 1990 to 73 million today — an increase of 252 percent over a period when the nation’s population increased 30 percent. Total spending on Medicaid today is $574 billion, 275 percent above the $209 billion of 2000. Medicaid amounts to about 40 percent of the total...
Readers Write: June 28

Media plays a role in inciting violence Instead of pointing fingers at Congress, the media should finally acknowledge that, since last November’s presidential election, it may be responsible for inciting some of the present-day violence in America. Even though elected in our democracy to serve the American people as president, Donald Trump has...
Opinion: The GOP health-care plan turns out to be no plan at all

For the last eight years, Republicans have claimed to have a plan to improve health care. If you didn’t like the deductibles under Obamacare, they told you that their plan would lower those deductibles. If you didn’t like rising premiums, their plan would lower those premiums. If you didn’t like the fact that Obamacare left 28 million...
More Stories