Opinion: Congress to America: Merry Christmas, suckers!


For more than a generation, the most pressing economic problem confronting the United States has been the growing concentration of wealth among the already wealthy. Whether through government policy, economic transformation or a combination of the two forces, the share of income and wealth available to the middle and working classes has been shrinking steadily for 40 years, and as available resources have declined, so too has the opportunity for economic advancement.

For much of that 40 years, one major political party has campaigned on the necessity of addressing that issue; the other dismissed such talk as “the politics of envy” or “class warfare.” But that policy logjam appeared to break, at least in the eyes of many, when the Republican Party chose as its 2016 presidential nominee a billionaire who offered himself as an unlikely working-class hero.

Yes, he had inherited a real estate empire; yes, over his career he had left a long string of broken contractors and cheated workers in his wake, yes, he reveled in personal conspicuous consumption. But as a member of the economic elite, he also promised listeners that he would take on what he called “the global power structure,” those “responsible for the economic decisions that have robbed our working class, stripped our country of its wealth and put that money into the pockets of a handful of large corporations and political entities.”

He promised to finally fix the tax code, telling audiences all over the country that he and other billionaires paid too little and he would fix it. He promised to protect Medicaid, Medicare and Social Security. He promised not only to repeal Obamacare, but to replace it with a program that provided even better coverage to even more people. He promised to get young people out from beneath student loan debt, to take on the pharmaceutical industry and Wall Street lobbyists for firms such as Goldman Sachs.

He even promised to do all that AND eliminate the national debt of $19 trillion.

In eight years.

And people — some people, enough people — believed him. They put their fervent faith in that man, invested their hopes and dreams in him, saw him as their champion. In return, they have gotten themselves and their country royally cheated.

Once in office, that billionaire president who attacked “the global power structure (that) stripped our country of its wealth” immediately installed that very power structure at every crucial post in the economic policy-making and regulatory apparatus. Head of the Treasury Department, check. Head of the Securities and Exchange Commission, check. Head of the Council of Economic Advisers, check. According to every credible, nonpartisan analysis, the new tax code that they are about to enact will compound, not reduce, economic inequity. It will significantly enrich those who have already benefited most over the last 40 years, including himself, while doing almost nothing long-term for those most in need.

It will also add a minimum of $1 trillion to the national debt. We are borrowing money from our children and grandchildren, without their permission, and we are doing so not to rescue an economy teetering on collapse, not to finance a major war of necessity, but to cut taxes by hundreds of billions of dollars for the already wealthy, and for corporations already reporting record-high after-tax profits.

It is absolutely remarkable, at this point in our nation’s history, to be enacting such policies. Merry Christmas, suckers.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Opinion

The right claims the left has chosen Dreamers over every other American
The right claims the left has chosen Dreamers over every other American

The right places the blame for the shutdown squarely on the Democrats and warns that voters may do the same in November. A roundup of editorials Monday takes a look at the shutdown. From the National Review: Republicans should agree to a limited DACA deal as long as they get one on chain migration and E-Verify. The Washington Examiner: How can Democrats...
Will the left be blamed for the government shutdown?
Will the left be blamed for the government shutdown?

As the government shutdown enters its third day, the left warns that come November midterms, voters will remember who stood for what. A roundup of editorials Monday takes a look at the shutdown. From The New Yorker: Why is the Dreamer issue tied to the shutdown? Because the fight isn’t over the budget, it’s about who will be let into the...
Opinion: What is the real message of #MeToo?

The feminist website Babe published an account of a date gone bad. The pushback has been swift and sharp. I share some of the concerns of the critics, but I also think young women are sending a message that is being missed. The account by the anonymous “Grace” about a bad date with comedian Aziz Ansari was, if not “3,000 words of...
Readers Write: Jan. 22

Perdue on wrong side of history It is now clear that U.S. Sen. David Perdue has no intention of separating himself from the racist attitudes on immigration that President Trump recently articulated. That is because Trump represents Perdue’s own attitudes and positions. However it may appear to him at this moment, history teaches us clearly that...
Readers Write: Jan. 21

Nonpartisan committee needed for districting maps News about gerrymandering seems to be everywhere … in the AJC, on radio and TV. A decision of the federal court in North Carolina overturned maps because of extreme partisan gerrymandering. Two cases currently before the Supreme Court involve Republican gerrymandering in Wisconsin and Democratic...
More Stories