Law and order agenda should take note of bipartisanship’s results



During his campaign for president, Donald Trump’s talking points on crime and punishment harkened back to an era of “tough on crime” campaign rhetoric that fueled the stump speeches of candidates like Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton.

Trump declared himself the “law and order” candidate and rang an alarm about a purported growing crime wave and chaotic inner cities. What he ignored was a two-decade drop in crime rates, along with the societal trauma caused by record-level incarceration and the disproportionate burden of criminalization on communities of color.

Barack Obama’s White House and Department of Justice have prioritized reducing excessive penalties for drug offenses, easing re-entry for people leaving imprisonment and rooting out racial disparity in the criminal justice system. During the final three years of his administration the federal prison population has declined by almost 28,000, following more than three decades of rising imprisonment.

As this politically divided nation prepares for the transition of power, President-elect Trump should take the time to talk to his Republican colleagues to review the national success story of criminal justice reform.

In recent years, America’s prison population has finally stabilized after nearly 40 years of unprecedented growth. Most states have seen declines in their prison populations because of policy reforms that curbed mandatory minimum sentences for low-level drug crimes, scaled back imprisonment for technical violations of parole and diverted small-time property and drug offenses from incarceration.

Four states — New Jersey, New York, Rhode Island and California — have seen prison population declines of more than 20 percent over the last 15 years with no adverse effect on public safety.

Bipartisan leaders in the U.S. Senate and House came together in the last year to endorse consensus-driven sentencing and corrections reform.

Senate Judiciary Chairman Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, championed the Sentencing Reform and Corrections Act — the most significant criminal justice reform legislation of a generation as described by his Democratic colleague Dick Durbin of Illinois. Grassley’s support for criminal justice reform was a dramatic reversal of position from earlier in 2015 when he called supporters of sentencing reform measures part of the “leniency industrial complex.”

Grassley’s conversion to reformer can be attributed to his moral understanding of justice, fairness, redemption and second chances, which he shares with fellow conservatives, as well as liberals Patrick Leahy and Durbin. The question now becomes how will President-elect Trump and his attorney general nominee, Jeff Sessions, respond?

Trump’s elevation of Sessions certainly dims prospects for continuing the progress to reduce the federal prison population.

While this year Sessions led a small but vocal group of senators in opposing the bipartisan sentencing reform, in the recent past Sessions has favored sentencing reforms. In 2010, he negotiated enactment of the Fair Sentencing Act with Durbin to address the extreme racial disparity in crack cocaine sentencing. Advocates hope that this successful sentencing reform can serve as a model for the new administration.

Much has changed since the “get tough” atmosphere of the 1980s. Lawmakers in both parties now support evidence-based policies that promote public safety, value opportunities for redemption and are cost-effective. The incoming president and attorney general would be wise to build on these initiatives in the months and years ahead.

Kara Gotsch is director of Strategic Initiatives at The Sentencing Project, a national criminal justice research and advocacy organization. She wrote this for InsideSources.com. Jay Bookman’s column returns soon.


Reader Comments


Next Up in News

College football playoff teams announced
College football playoff teams announced
The four teams that earned spots in the College Football Playoff were named Sunday, and there really were no surprises.
Obamacare was profitable for some insurers despite public comments
Obamacare was profitable for some insurers despite public comments
One of the most vocal insurers about the problems with the Affordable Care Act marketplace made nearly $400 million in one state already this...
Bundle up! Arctic blast to put most of the U.S. in a deep freeze this week
Here it comes, ready or not. After a warm November, the coldest weather of the season is forecast to roar across almost all of the United States...
Death toll rises to 30 in Oakland warehouse fire
 The death toll rose to 30 Sunday and could still climb after a massive weekend fire roared through this city's "Ghost...
Trump touts tariff, officials deflect criticism of Taiwan call
 Donald Trump and aides braced for a busy week Sunday by threatening tariffs on companies that move jobs overseas, while downplaying...
More Stories

You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myAJC.com.

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of free premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

X

Welcome to myAJC.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myAJC.com.