You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myAJC.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myAJC.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myAJC.com.

Finances questioned for proposed DeKalb city of LaVista Hills


A study of the proposed city of LaVista Hills’ finances relied on unrealistic tax estimates that overstated its viability, according to a researcher’s analysis.

The legislation authorizing LaVista Hills capped its property tax rates below the level used by the University of Georgia’s Carl Vinson Institute of Government to conclude that it was financially solid. Lower-than-expected tax revenue could constrain the new government’s ability to offer services.

The analysis by Russell Carleton, a researcher who lives in the LaVista Hills area and opposes the cityhood proposal, showed that the city would have had a projected deficit of about $114,000 under its maximum tax rate in 2014, a steep drop from the $1.7 million surplus estimated by UGA.

The UGA study was commissioned for $15,000 by supporters of LaVista Hills as the cityhood proposal was advancing through Georgia’s legislative process. Voters will decide whether to form the cities of LaVista Hills and Tucker during a Nov. 3 referendum.

“If you take the time to look up the numbers, it doesn’t pan out that well,” Carleton told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution last week. “The reason the state requires this (study) is that if in the event a city goes insolvent, the state has to back them up. It’s kind of uncharted territory.”

Cityhood proponents said they remain confident that LaVista Hills, which would include about 67,000 residents, is financially feasible.

“A city will be able to provide services at a much less expensive rate than the county does currently,” said Mary Kay Woodworth, a member of the LaVista Hills Alliance. “That makes a huge difference to the bottom line.”

The UGA study provided a conservative estimate of LaVista Hills’ finances, and it’s no substitute for real-life budgeting decisions that elected officials would have to make, said Kevin Levitas, a supporter of the potential city.

“My hope is that if LaVista Hills passes, the city council will do whatever it can to come up with the most efficient ways to provide services and do it in a cost-effective manner,” he said. “One of the big drivers of cityhood movements is allowing people a voice in how their tax money is being spent.”

But Carleton, who has taught university-level research methods and statistics, said he doesn’t think UGA’s numbers add up. The university’s evaluation of LaVista Hills, which was completed in May, didn’t account for its proposed tax structure as contained in the bill that passed the Legislature on April 2 and was signed by Gov. Nathan Deal on May 12.

The university conducts financial studies for proposed cities based on known factors such as predetermined boundaries and existing revenue sources, said Shannon Ferguson, a spokeswoman for the UGA Carl Vinson Institute. At the time of LaVista Hills’ study, its legislation — including limits on property tax rates — hadn’t yet been signed into law.

“Unknown factors would be similar to trying to hit a moving target,” Ferguson said. “The institute’s study accurately reflects what we analyzed at the time the LaVista Hills study was completed for the client.”

Reducing LaVista Hills’ expenses to match its income wouldn’t be an easy task for city’s future leaders, said Joel Gottlieb, a former DeKalb County finance director.

“It would be very concerning if there’s a negative cash flow,” he said. “Of course they could adjust their expenses, but they have certain services that have to be provided like police, general government operations, the city council and the mayor that are required that they can’t reduce.”

Sen. Elena Parent, the chairwoman of a Senate task force evaluating the state’s cityhood approval process, said she will ask UGA and Georgia State University, which studied Tucker’s feasibility, about how their analysis can be improved.

“They give a rough outline. I don’t think their usefulness should be overstated,” said Parent, D-Atlanta.

Unlike LaVista Hills, the Tucker feasibility study’s assumptions remained valid after its legislation passed. Georgia State University researchers assumed a lower property tax rate than the maximum approved by state lawmakers, and they concluded that Tucker’s estimated revenue would exceed expenditures by nearly $800,000.

LaVista Hills is envisioned as a full-service city with police and many other services. Tucker would have a more limited government without a municipal police force, and it would provide basic services of planning and zoning, code enforcement, and parks and recreation.

The outlook for LaVista Hills’ finances improved this year, though it’s unclear by how much, Carleton said.

UGA’s evaluation used 2014 data, and rising property values in 2015 led to higher tax collections across Metro Atlanta this year, including in the LaVista Hills area.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Georgia Politics

Watchdog: What does the Civil War have to do with us?
Watchdog: What does the Civil War have to do with us?

When House Speaker David Ralston punished fellow Republican Rep. Tommy Benton last week, stripping him of his committee chairmanship and removing him from a study committee on civics education, it came after nearly two years of provocative political acts. But it was the distribution to his House colleagues of an article from the magazine...
While losing, Ossoff easily won DeKalb’s vote in 6th District
While losing, Ossoff easily won DeKalb’s vote in 6th District

Democrat John Ossoff lost the 6th District race Tuesday, despite easily carrying DeKalb County’s portion of the vote. He recorded 33,847 votes to Republican Karen Handel’s 24,070 in the faithfully blue county, according to unofficial results. Handel prevailed in the northernmost eight precincts in the district, which also includes...
How did your Cobb neighbors vote in the 6th District runoff election?
How did your Cobb neighbors vote in the 6th District runoff election?

Republican Karen Handel beat Democrat Jon Ossoff in the 6th Congressional District race Tuesday night, becoming Georgia’s first female Republican member of the U.S. House. What would usually be a tame special election in an historically red section of the Atlanta suburbs brought obscene amounts of national attention and dollars...
How Handel won Georgia’s 6th District race
How Handel won Georgia’s 6th District race

Karen Handel’s victorious path through Georgia’s 6th Congressional District began in the outskirts of downtown Marietta and tore through the conservative stronghold of east Cobb County. It darted through her hometown of Roswell and into the affluent deep-red bastions of Milton and parts of Johns Creek. Handel staved off what would have...
When will Karen Handel be sworn into office?
When will Karen Handel be sworn into office?

It could take a few days — or even a couple of weeks — for Karen Handel to be sworn in as the newest member of the House of Representatives. The Republican defeated documentary filmmaker Jon Ossoff Tuesday evening in a nationally-watched contest for Georgia’s 6th District congressional seat. With 100 percent of precincts reporting...
More Stories