You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myAJC.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myAJC.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myAJC.com.

House members send mail on taxpayer's dime, vulnerable ones do it much more


WASHINGTON — Members of Congress can, at no cost to their re-election campaigns, send mail or advertisements to constituents in their districts — and vulnerable House members are disproportionately taking advantage of it.

Legislators running for re-election in non-safe districts are spending almost three times as much on taxpayer-funded mail, on average, as those running in safe districts, according to a Roll Call analysis of spending data from the House and Sunlight Foundation.

Members in both chambers have the privilege known as mail franking, which uses their signatures instead of stamps to send mail to constituents. The cost of sending mail — which technically can be anything from post cards to Facebook advertisements — comes out of House members' office budgets, which are made available by the Chief Administrative Officer of the House.

Because of rules that prevent members from using franking too close to elections, Wednesday was the last day for members to send mass mail on the taxpayer's dime.

Franking dates back to colonial times, and concern over its effect on elections is not new. Back in 1972, Andrew H. Wasmund at the Loyola Law School argued that the member's privilege amounts to a "competitive advantage" over opponents, and that regulations to prevent this were "virtually ineffective."

Since then, Congress has created additional restrictions enforced by a bipartisan group of lawmakers. Now, members can only send mail within their districts, and they have spending budgets that must be disclosed to the public. The ban on sending mass mail before elections also increased from 60 to 90 days, according to the Congressional Research Service.

As that deadline passes this election season, it's not yet known if members have sent a last-minute flurry of mailers, since spending totals for August won't be available until later this year. But the most recent data available suggest vulnerable members, as ranked by the Rothenberg and Gonzalez Political Report/Roll Call race ratings, still have something to be gained from franked mail, in spite of the changes.

On average, members running for re-election in non-safe districts spent $172 per day on mail franking. That's far more than the $63 per day that members in safe districts have spent.

Three of the top four spenders on mail between January 2015 and March 2016 are running in some of the most vulnerable districts in the country: Republican Reps. Rod Blum in Iowa's 1st District, Frank C. Guinta in the New Hampshire 1st and Will Hurd in the Texas 23rd.

Jay Ruais, chief of staff for Guinta, said the congressman is "committed to openness and transparency, including communicating our efforts on behalf of Granite Staters, important at a time when many feel alienated from their federal government. As a result of our correspondence, constituents have offered ideas for legislation that Rep. Guinta introduced in Congress, and a few have even been signed into law."

Rachel Holland, press secretary for Hurd, said: "As a representative for one of the largest geographic and rural districts in the country, Rep. Hurd utilizes a number of outlets to regularly communicate with constituents."

Every member of the House running in a district that is not safe has spent at least $2,000 on mail so far this Congress, and combined they've spent over $2 million.

In total, House members spent about $6 million on mail franking in the first quarter of 2016. Senators also have the mail franking privilege, but the chamber publishes its spending information in a way that's more difficult to analyze; this information was not included in Roll Call's report.

None of the bottom 50 House spenders on mail franking are from competitive districts. The member who spent the least in a competitive district was Rep. Brad Ashford, D-Neb.

For nearly all members, this spending represents a small portion of their total office budgets. Since everything from water bottles to staff salaries come out of the same account, known as members' representational allowances, mail franking typically amounts to a very small proportion of a members' total spending.

But it's not always that way.

Blum, the Iowa Republican, spent the most of any House member on franked mail and the least on staff. His office did not respond to multiple requests for comment for this article, though he dismissed criticism of his mailers in an interview with local ABC affiliate KCRG.

"What they do is let the voters in my district — there are 20 counties, a lot of them are very rural — let them know what we're doing," Blum said. "Letting people know about our veterans care fairs, senior wellness fairs and our job fairs."

A franking commission of six House members has to sign off on all pieces of franked mail before they're sent, and there are measures in place to ensure members can't use their mailing privileges to bolster campaigns.

Members aren't allowed, for example, to make partisan points or criticize their colleagues in franked mail. Specific guidelines dictate how many times members can mention themselves (eight times per page), and how big photos of the member can be (six square inches on an 8.5-by-11-inch piece of paper).

Members are explicitly banned from referring to their future congressional careers ("If I'm re-elected ..."), too.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Local

Police seek pajama-clad man, pregnant woman in Waffle House robbery
Police seek pajama-clad man, pregnant woman in Waffle House robbery

Authorities are searching for two people they believed robbed a Waffle House about 6 a.m. Saturday, according to the Coweta County Sheriff’s Office.  Few details were released on the actual robbery, but officials say on of the suspects walked into the Waffle House in Newnan located on the 4400 block of Ga. 154. The man wore a hooded winter...
Cops: Mother on life-support after son’s father shoots her
Cops: Mother on life-support after son’s father shoots her

A Forest Park woman is on life support after she was shot during a fight with her son’s father last week, the Clayton County Sheriff’s Office said.  Anthony Mickel has been on the run for three days since police say he shot his son’s mother. No details were released on what led to the fight.  Police describe Mickel as 5-foot-11...
GBI: Narcan may be no match for two new fentanyl strains
GBI: Narcan may be no match for two new fentanyl strains

Two new strains of fentanyl are so deadly, they may be immune to naloxone, also known as Narcan, the drug used to save those who have overdosed, the GBI said Tuesday in a news release.  Acrylfentanyl and tetrahydrofuran fentanyl were not identified by the GBI until March, when the Forsyth County Sheriff’s Office submitted the drugs as part...
Gwinnett approves $2M contract to reconfigure courthouse entrance
Gwinnett approves $2M contract to reconfigure courthouse entrance

The front entrance to the Gwinnett Justice and Administration Center is about to get a little more aesthetically pleasing — and user-friendly. Gwinnett’s Board of Commissioners approved Tuesday afternoon a $1.93 million contract to reconfigure the entryway to the county’s main courthouse and administrative building. That will include...
U.S. Marshals join search for couple accused in ‘cold chicken’ beating; $2K reward offered
U.S. Marshals join search for couple accused in ‘cold chicken’ beating; $2K reward offered

U.S. Marshals have joined the search for a couple accused in a violent beating over a food order in southeast Georgia. LaTasha and Nathaniel Eric Smith are wanted on aggravated assault charges after they allegedly punched a food stand owner and her 15-year-old daughter, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution previously reported.  The attack happened...
More Stories