CBO: White House budget wouldn't eliminate deficit or do much to grow economy


WASHINGTON — The Congressional Budget Office said Thursday that President Trump's first budget plan would not eliminate the deficit over 10 years or grow the economy at all by 2021, casting doubt on the administration's controversial economic assumptions that were supposed to bolster key parts of the White House's agenda over the next year.

CBO projected that the sweeping spending reductions on anti-poverty programs, housing, environmental protection, and a number of other initiatives that the White House wants to cull back would still not be enough to eliminate the deficit by 2027.

But in that year, the deficit would be $720 billion under the White House's budget, CBO said. The White House asserted the government would actually have a budget surplus in 2027 if its policies were enacted, bringing in more money through revenue than it spent. That's a more than $700 billion gap in just one year between the CBO and White House.

This contrasts sharply with the White House's internal estimates, which argued that cutting taxes would create an economic boom that solved many of the country's budget problems.

RELATED: White House overlooks bigger picture on CBO’s Obamacare estimates

The White House also estimated that its budget changes would lead the economy to grow by 3 percent per year. CBO found, however, that economic growth would only average 1.9 percent per year under the White House's plan.

The assessment raises new questions about whether Republicans will be able to build a coalition of conservative and centrist lawmakers who can agree on a single budget proposal. By rejecting the White House's declaration that largescale spending reductions and unspecified tax cuts will lead to economic growth, CBO could make it harder for this coalition of GOP lawmakers to band together. House lawmakers had hoped to begin voting on their budget plan as soon as next week.

Some key elements of the White House's agenda rely on Congress's ability to pass a budget. For example, they only need 50 Republicans in the Senate to approve a tax plan if it is part of an already authorized budget plan through a process known as reconciliation. If Congress doesn't pass a budget plan, they will need 60 votes to authorize tax cuts. There are only 52 Republicans in the 100-seat Senate, meaning they would have to cut deals with Democrats under this scenario.

CBO's new projections came with a significant caveat, saying the lack of detail the White House has provided about its plans — primarily its plan to overhaul the tax code — made it virtually impossible for the agency to determine what the economic impact of these ideas would be. The White House has put out only a sparse, one-page blueprint for overhauling the tax code, but it offered few details beyond saying that the changes would add trillions of dollars in new revenue to the budget because there would be so much future economic growth.

"The President's proposals would affect the economy in a variety of ways," CBO wrote in its assessment. "However, because the details on many of the proposed policies are not available at this time, CBO cannot provide an analysis of all their macroeconomic effects or of the budgetary feedback that would result from those effects."

If CBO, which is run by a Republican appointee, raises questions about the lack of details in the White House's tax plan now, it could serve as a warning to the White House and other Republicans as they try to design a more comprehensive plan in the coming months that is still expected to rely in large part on the assumption that the economy will grow markedly because of large tax cuts.

RELATED: Trump's infrastructure plan is caught in White House turf war

And there were cases where CBO simply rejected the White House's budget cutting assumptions. For example, the White House said that "reducing improper payments governmentwide" would save $139 billion over 10 years, something they believe would help them eventually eliminate the deficit. But CBO said the White House simply wouldn't provide enough details as to where the White House would find such improper payments to eliminate, and it discounted any savings from this endeavor.

Still, CBO said the White House's plan would essentially cut government spending by $4.2 trillion over 10 years compared with existing law, a very large sum.

The White House seized on this element of CBO's assessment in its initial response.

"We are thrilled that CBO confirms that the President's proposed Budget resulted in the largest deficit reduction they have ever scored," White House Office of Management and Budget spokeswoman Meghan Burris said. "CBO agrees that this is the largest deficit reduction package in American history. This Administration is committed to making the necessary investments to restore our military, secure our borders, and modernize our infrastructure."

CBO did not stipulate in its assessment that the White House's plan would be the "largest deficit reduction package in American history," as Burris stated. A CBO official said later that it did not do a historical analysis of the White House's plan. Many Democrats and Republicans often cite the budget deal cut between the Clinton administration and Republicans in Congress as being the largest in recent decades, in part because it completely eliminated the deficit and created a budget surplus.

CBO is a government agency that assesses the cost and impact of legislation, and the White House has repeatedly attacked its economic assumptions, even as recently as Wednesday.

By rejecting the White House's budget and economic projections, CBO could embolden Democrats who oppose the White House's plans to cut spending and taxes because many Democrats have argued that the Trump administration's growth forecasts are flawed.

RELATED: The key spending cuts and increases in Trump's budget

"The CBO report shows that the president built his budget on fantasy projections," said Rep. John Yarmuth, D-Ky. "The facts are that Trump's extreme proposals would severely underinvest in our families and communities, while at the same time give millionaires and corporations massive tax breaks."

Trump came into office promising sweeping budget changes. He wanted to slash the size of government, roll back hundreds of regulations, reduce the size of the federal workforce, and grow the military. A key component of his plan, though, would eliminate the budget deficit over 10 years. The "deficit" is the annual gap between spending and revenue, and annual deficits add to the government's nearly $20 trillion federal debt.

But his budget writers also had major challenges in writing the budget. Trump instructed them that they could not cut benefits for Medicare or Social Security retirement, two of the largest parts of the budget. That forced OMB Director Mick Mulvaney to concentrate spending cuts elsewhere, and anti-poverty programs were among those to take the largest reductions.

The White House's budget proposal was released in May and sets government spending levels for the year that begins October 1. It essentially makes recommendations to Congress, which is responsible for drawing up the budget and appropriating funds to use. Congress often uses the White House's budget proposal as a set of guidelines.


Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Homepage