You have reached your limit of free articles this month.

Enjoy unlimited access to myAJC.com

Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks.

GREAT REASONS TO SUBSCRIBE TODAY!

  • IN-DEPTH REPORTING
  • INTERACTIVE STORYTELLING
  • NEW TOPICS & COVERAGE
  • ePAPER
X

You have read of premium articles.

Get unlimited access to all of our breaking news, in-depth coverage and bonus content- exclusively for subscribers. Starting at just 99¢ for 8 weeks

X

Welcome to myAJC.com

This subscriber-only site gives you exclusive access to breaking news, in-depth coverage, exclusive interactives and bonus content.

You can read free articles of your choice a month that are only available on myAJC.com.

Georgia Power preps for more nuclear projects


Georgia Power is inching closer to doubling down on what few utilities in the nation are willing to bet on: building more nuclear reactors.

With work on two new reactors under way at Plant Vogtle, the company is considering asking state regulators as soon as next spring to let it take initial steps toward adding more.

There is a “very high” probability it will do so, Georgia Power CEO Paul Bowers told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution in an interview.

If the company takes the leap and eventually gets a federal license, construction of more nuclear reactors is likely to push already rising electric bills higher. But it also promises to give Georgia more electricity without the carbon emissions being targeted by federal regulators fighting climate change.

Bowers didn’t offer an estimate of how much another round of reactors might cost or how much monthly power bills might rise. But he said, “If you build anything, there’s a cost to it.”

What Georgia Power builds is a big bet — using the promise of consumers’ money for generations to come — on where the state’s electricity future will be for perhaps the next 60 years or more.

“We are going to have to build something,” Bowers said. “It’s going to be based on what is the best economic choice for our customers.”

Extensive prep work is needed before seeking a federal license, and Bowers said starting that effort isn’t a commitment to build.

He said the company will evaluate whether to build a new plant or expand its existing nuclear plants — Vogtle near Augusta and Plant Hatch near Baxley in south Georgia.

Some environmental and consumer groups have blasted the Vogtle expansion, calling it uneeded and too expensive. They want the state’s largest utility to instead boost energy efficiency programs and use of alternative energy sources such as solar power.

Building more nuclear is “the most dinosaur business model,” said Liz Coyle, acting executive director of consumer group Georgia Watch. “It’s the riskiest, most infrastructure intensive (option). It might be good for their shareholders, but it’s the riskiest for my dollars.”

“Now is not the time for them to be looking at expanding nuclear when they can’t even complete the ones they’ve started,” Coyle said.

Georgia Power is the lead utility on the $14-billion-plus Vogtle expansion. That project’s construction costs are hundreds of millions of dollars over original estimates. The two new units are a year and half behind schedule, with the first one now expected to go online in late 2017, followed by the other a year later. The project contractor has cited challenges in meeting the latest schedule, Georgia Power disclosed in a report to regulators this week. Consultants for state regulators warned earlier this year that each day of delay adds $2 million to the project’s cost.

Georgia Power customers already pay extra — 4 percent on average — on monthly bills for the Vogtle expansion’s financing costs. Once the project’s full cost is rolled in, the company predicts another 2 to 4 percent increase that will stay on bills for years to come.

Consumer and environmental activists say Georgia Power has far more generating capacity than needed. But the company said it forecasts demand for more from 2020 to 2030, due to both growth in the state and shutdowns of older plants as they reach their lifespan limits.

New nuclear units can take a decade to get from design and licensing to construction and startup.

“We need to start the licensing process now,” Bowers said.

Just doing seismic studies, transmission analysis and other prep work before applying for a federal nuclear license could cost $50 million over several years. Such spending would have to win approval from the Georgia Public Service Commission.

Chuck Eaton, who chairs the five-member elected body, said the state may have to consider more nuclear because of White House attempts to curb coal-burning power plants.

Stan Wise, another PSC commissioner, said, he is cautious about undertaking another nuclear project.

Georgians will have to digest a “pretty significant cost” for the ongoing Vogtle expansion, he said. “I don’t see this commission embracing the next generation of nuclear until we get to the day when we know what the cost is (of the current expansion) and are actually generating from” the new units.

Georgia Power is already a pioneer in what was envisioned to be a stampede of new nuclear construction in the U.S. The Vogtle reactors were the first newly licensed units in 30 years. TVA in Tennessee and SCANA Corp. in South Carolina also have nuclear construction underway.

But the idea of a broad resurgence has dimmed, in part because falling natural gas prices have made that fuel a cheaper alternative. U.S. utilities have 74 natural gas units under construction, vs. five nuclear units at three plants. And a far bigger wave of natural gas plants is in the works.

While many utilities started the licensing process for more nuclear units, plans for some have languished. Several put their applications on hold.



Reader Comments ...


Next Up in Business

Woodward Academy: Q&A with visual arts teacher Andy Cunningham

Andy Cunningham finds it strange to say out loud that he’s worked for Woodward Academy for 32 years. When he joined the city’s oldest private college preparatory school in 1985, he had no plan to be a high school teacher. Cunningham, who holds a bachelor’s degree and MFA from Georgia State University, was the first black male on faculty...
Executives believe in collaboration, balance

The leaders of the top small, midsize and large workplaces shared what makes them proud and advice for companies trying to improve their corporate culture. Answers have been edited for brevity and clarity. Q: What are key components of the company’s culture? Pat Flood, regional operating partner, Supreme Lending’s Southeast region: Our...
Woodward Academy: Top Large Workplace

Students and faculty whiz around President Stuart Gulley in the foyer of the light-filled renovated Thalia N. Carlos Science Center, which re-opened in 2016 at Woodward Academy in College Park. During a change in classes, Gulley stops a student dressed in a blue blazer and khakis, Woodward’s school uniform, and brags about his success in a recent...
What AutomationDirect.com employees say

AutomationDirect.com ADC provides a spectacularly positive work environment and provides a frequent and detailed vision for the company! ADC is, hands-down, the best place I have ever worked! I am given complete freedom in deciding how to execute my work and the company provides the best resources to get the job done. The company culture is most inclusive...
AutomationDirect.com: Q&A with Leisa Cudworth in product management

Leisa Cudworth often uses her lunch hour to exercise. It’s easy for her to work up a sweat since AutomationDirect.com has onsite exercise programs and facilities. “You get to do it at lunch or different times (of the day), so when evening comes, you get to go home to your family,” she said. Cudworth, who has worked her way from inside...
More Stories