First, about Joe Johnson.
He is 34 years old and staring at the finish line of his career. So it wasn't surprising that he was anxious to take a buyout of the final season of his contract in the NBA's black hole that is Brooklyn, with the apparent intent to sign with a title contender. But if reports are true that Johnson will sign with Miami this weekend after officially clearing waivers, a championship ring clearly wasn't high on his agenda or he would've signed with Cleveland.
The Heat are among the afterthought teams in the Eastern Conference. When Johnson made his decision, they were in fourth place at 1½ games ahead of the Hawks and they might be even more of a longshot in the playoffs than Atlanta given Chris Bosh's unlikely return. I'm not sure where the Heat fit in the pecking order among the teams interested in Johnson but they're definitely not in the top three (Cleveland, Oklahoma City, Toronto), which tells you the biggest concern about Johnson's potential return to the Hawks -- that he just wants his shots and his minutes -- has been reaffirmed.
Joe loves Joe. And possibly the beach.
"Joe had a lot of options and I think it's stone crab season," Hawks CEO Steve Koonin said on the "Dukes and Bell" show on 92.9 FM.
Now , about the Hawks.
They went 0-for-2. They're not going to admit this publicly, but a source said they had strong interest in signing Anderson Varejao when Cleveland waived the power forward/center, only to see Varejao opt to sign with Golden State. (Conclusion: Winning a title was a high priority for Varejao, unlike Johnson.) They also badly wanted Johnson to give them another viable scoring option, especially given their struggles on the wings with Kent Bazemore and Kyle Korver.
So what's the plan now? Hold hands and pray for a group healing?
These Hawks don't remotely look like the team of a year ago. Since a high-water mark of 26-17 on Jan. 20, they're 6-10, even with Friday night's win over Chicago, and spiraling down in the standings. They weren't an overly physical team last season when they won 60 games but they've lost their edge at both ends of the court and they've been erratic.
At times, they lack passion.
At times, they lack defense.
The sense of urgency they played with a year ago: it comes and goes.
I don't believe Mike Budenholzer became a bad coach overnight, but in situations like this it's common for some to wonder if players have started to tune out their coach. Budenholzer shot down that theory when I asked him about it Thursday and Al Horford similarly came to his coach's defense: "No, the coaches have been great with us. It’s about us as players taking that next step with this team. I really think once we start winning a couple of games, we'll be fine."
When asked about the attitude in the locker room, Horford also maintained, "Guys are in a good place. Obviously we’re frustrated with the way things are going. But the coach has been great. He’s supporting us. Guys are getting in their work."
The results haven't been there, however. I've addressed likely reasons for this before but I think it comes down to personnel issues. Budenholzer and general manager Wes Wilcox did not adequately replace DeMarre Carroll, who left in free agency.
A case could be made they also miss the edge and physical presence that Pero Antic supplied. Tiago Splitter was expected to help as a big off the bench but his play was mediocre to average and then he suffered a season-ending hip injury.
None of this means the Hawks won't suddenly get on a roll and maybe even a round of playoffs. But a return to the Eastern Conference finals is a longshot. Johnson might've helped them a little but he likely wouldn't have changed the big picture.
I doubt Johnson would change Miami's fortunes, either. But what does it say that he apparently chose the Heat over the Hawks? Or maybe it's just about the beach.
Recent ramblings from the Digital Jukebox
- Poll: It's your turn to vote on Hawks' potential signing of Joe Johnson
- (Updated column) Hawks traded Joe Johnson -- now they want him back?
- (Early version) Hawks considering bringing back Joe Johnson (this is not a drill)
- Roddy White: 'Bridge just broke down' between he, Shanahan
- Roddy White opens up on Falcons' offense, Shanahan, his future
- Woods' agent disputes report of setback, but who's telling truth?
- Get ready for 'March Sadness' in state of Georgia (again)
- Hawks have turned into 'Team Sometimes'
- Hawks emerge from All-Star break a sloppy and miserable mess
- Hawks may need change but now is not time for major deal
- SUPER BOWL: After MVP season, Cam Newton has quiet exit
- SUPER BOWL: Denver's defense gifts a title for Peyton Manning
- SUPER BOWL: Short takes: Both quarterbacks struggle but it was a day for defenses
- SUPER BOWL: Get used to this Atlanta: Cam, Panthers are on winning path
- SUPER BOWL: Torn ACLs, broken arm won't stop Thomas Davis
- SUPER BOWL: Goodell on head injuries: 'There's risk in sitting on couch' (Huh?)
- SUPER BOWL: Carolina has been dismissive of its lone loss to Falcons
- SUPER BOWL: Dan Quinn is the miracle man of Super Bowl week
- SUPER BOWL: Cam Newton might be at his press conference breaking point
- SUPER BOWL: Ex-Falcons coach Wade Phillips back on top at 68
- SUPER BOWL: Love him or hate him, Cam Newton has gift: winning amid storm
- SUPER BOWL: Carolina gets tip on Super Bowl week -- from Eugene Robinson
- SUPER BOWL: Super Bowl Digi-Blog: Peyton Manning, Cam Newton and Me vs. Puppet
- SUPER BOWL: There's no reason for Manning to worry about his legacy
- 'How They Really Stand' in Atlanta sports (2016 edition)
- 3 teams, 3 questions: Quinn could be on hook as much as Dimitroff in '16
- Falcons' Dimitroff jumps on the grenade (smart guy)
- Falcons hire two former general managers -- and that makes five
- Four-point analysis: Falcons are a ways behind Carolina
- Braves' starting rotation ranked 30th (and it's hard to dispute)
- SUPER BOWL: About Atlanta's hate for Cam Newton and the Panthers ...
- NFL's Final Four all have something Falcons don't
- Mike Smith says he's 'recharged," avoids references to Falcons
- Braves' free-agent interest has its limits